Ad is loading...
CWB vs ICVT
CWB vs ICVT Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs ICVT
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
Price$80.51
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
Volume$359
Net Assets3.79B
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
Price$87.63
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
Volume$600
Net Assets2.46B
CWB vs ICVT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. ICVT commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a Buy and ICVT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWB has more net assets: 3.79B vs. ICVT (2.46B). CWB (3.932) and ICVT (3.887) have matching annual dividend yield . CWB was incepted earlier than ICVT: CWB (16 years) vs ICVT (10 years). ICVT (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than CWB (0.40). CWB has a higher turnover ICVT (25.00) vs ICVT (25.00).
| CWB | ICVT | CWB / ICVT | |
| Gain YTD | 3.932 | 3.887 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 3.79B | 2.46B | 154% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.20 | 200% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 25.00 | 120% |
| Yield | 1.90 | 2.25 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | ICVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | +4.58% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| SO - CWB | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.52% |
ICVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICVT has been loosely correlated with W. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICVT jumps, then W could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICVT | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| W - ICVT | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| TDOC - ICVT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| CCL - ICVT | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
| Z - ICVT | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| VRNT - ICVT | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||