| CWB | ICVT | CWB / ICVT | |
| Gain YTD | 14.821 | 16.622 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 4.61B | 3.42B | 135% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.20 | 200% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 25.00 | 128% |
| Yield | 1.73 | 1.77 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| CWB | ICVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PCCE | 13.72 | N/A | N/A |
| Polen Capital China Growth ETF | |||
| CTWO | 18.80 | N/A | N/A |
| COtwo Advs Physical Eur Carb AllowanceTr | |||
| BKEM | 73.71 | -0.07 | -0.09% |
| BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | |||
| DMAY | 44.22 | -0.09 | -0.20% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF May | |||
| EWA | 25.40 | -0.24 | -0.94% |
| iShares MSCI Australia ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| SO - CWB | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.12% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICVT has been loosely correlated with W. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICVT jumps, then W could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICVT | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| W - ICVT | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.74% | ||
| TDOC - ICVT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| CCL - ICVT | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| Z - ICVT | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| VRNT - ICVT | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||