Ad is loading...
CWB vs ICVT
CWB vs ICVT Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs ICVT
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
Price$76.69
Change+$0.78 (+1.03%)
Volume$750
Net Assets3.48B
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
Price$83.71
Change+$0.69 (+0.83%)
Volume$3K
Net Assets2.35B
CWB vs ICVT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. ICVT commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a StrongBuy and ICVT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWB has more net assets: 3.48B vs. ICVT (2.35B). ICVT has a higher annual dividend yield than CWB: ICVT (-1.799) vs CWB (-2.109). CWB was incepted earlier than ICVT: CWB (16 years) vs ICVT (10 years). ICVT (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than CWB (0.40). CWB has a higher turnover ICVT (22.00) vs ICVT (22.00).
| CWB | ICVT | CWB / ICVT | |
| Gain YTD | -2.109 | -1.799 | 117% |
| Net Assets | 3.48B | 2.35B | 148% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.20 | 200% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 22.00 | 136% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 2.27 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | ICVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 75% | 17 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | +1.11% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 46% Loosely correlated | +6.01% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| SO - CWB | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.79% |
ICVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICVT has been loosely correlated with W. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICVT jumps, then W could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICVT | 100% | +1.19% | ||
| W - ICVT | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| TDOC - ICVT | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| CCL - ICVT | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| Z - ICVT | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| VRNT - ICVT | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.89% | ||
More | ||||