Ad is loading...
CWB vs ICVT
CWB vs ICVT Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs ICVT
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
Price$78.78
Change-$1.99 (-2.46%)
Volume$2.68K
CapitalizationN/A
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
Price$85.89
Change-$2.16 (-2.45%)
Volume$1.03K
CapitalizationN/A
CWB vs ICVT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. ICVT commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a Hold and ICVT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWB has more net assets: 4.67B vs. ICVT (2.64B). ICVT (14.252) and CWB (13.727) have matching annual dividend yield . CWB was incepted earlier than ICVT: CWB (16 years) vs ICVT (10 years). ICVT has a higher turnover CWB (7.00) vs CWB (7.00).
| CWB | ICVT | CWB / ICVT | |
| Gain YTD | 13.727 | 14.252 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 4.67B | 2.64B | 177% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 22.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 1.94 | 1.88 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | ICVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 20 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | -0.52% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| SO - CWB | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.71% |
ICVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICVT has been loosely correlated with W. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICVT jumps, then W could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICVT | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| W - ICVT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TDOC - ICVT | 60% Loosely correlated | -5.71% | ||
| CCL - ICVT | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| Z - ICVT | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| VRNT - ICVT | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
More | ||||