Ad is loading...
CWB vs QCON
CWB vs QCON Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs QCON
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
Price$73.01
Change-$1.92 (-2.56%)
Volume$28.11K
Net Assets3.8B
American Century Quality Cnvtbl Scts ETF
Price$42.54
Change-$1.11 (-2.54%)
Volume$822
Net Assets46.84M
CWB vs QCON Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. QCON commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a Hold and QCON is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWB has more net assets: 3.8B vs. QCON (46.8M). CWB has a higher annual dividend yield than QCON: CWB (-3.373) vs QCON (-3.557). CWB was incepted earlier than QCON: CWB (16 years) vs QCON (4 years). QCON (0.32) has a lower expense ratio than CWB (0.40). QCON has a higher turnover CWB (30.00) vs CWB (30.00).
| CWB | QCON | CWB / QCON | |
| Gain YTD | -3.373 | -3.557 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 3.8B | 46.8M | 8,128% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.32 | 125% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 63.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 2.71 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | QCON | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | -3.02% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 51% Loosely correlated | -8.00% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| SO - CWB | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.38% |
QCON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QCON and ECPG have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QCON and ECPG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCON | 100% | -2.72% | ||
| ECPG - QCON | 16% Poorly correlated | -5.76% | ||
| PCG - QCON | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
| GTLS - QCON | 11% Poorly correlated | -17.55% | ||
| VIAV - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | -8.50% | ||
| AEP - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.26% | ||
More | ||||