Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWB vs QCON
CWB vs QCON Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs QCON
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
Price$81.13
Change+$0.63 (+0.78%)
Volume$735
Net Assets3.81B
American Century Quality Cnvtbl Scts ETF
Price$46.58
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
Volume$2.25K
Net Assets48.52M
CWB vs QCON Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. QCON commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a Buy and QCON is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWB has more net assets: 3.81B vs. QCON (48.5M). CWB has a higher annual dividend yield than QCON: CWB (4.205) vs QCON (3.347). CWB was incepted earlier than QCON: CWB (16 years) vs QCON (4 years). QCON (0.32) has a lower expense ratio than CWB (0.40). QCON has a higher turnover CWB (30.00) vs CWB (30.00).
| CWB | QCON | CWB / QCON | |
| Gain YTD | 4.205 | 3.347 | 126% |
| Net Assets | 3.81B | 48.5M | 7,864% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.32 | 125% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 63.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 1.92 | 2.67 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | QCON | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 17 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| SO - CWB | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.10% |
QCON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QCON and ECPG have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QCON and ECPG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCON | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| ECPG - QCON | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.79% | ||
| PCG - QCON | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
| GTLS - QCON | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| VIAV - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| AEP - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||