CWBC
Price
$18.63
Change
-$0.11 (-0.59%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
137.38M
FFMH
Price
$43.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWBC vs FFMH

Header iconCWBC vs FFMH Comparison
Open Charts CWBC vs FFMHBanner chart's image
Community West Bancshares
Price$18.63
Change-$0.11 (-0.59%)
Volume$452
Capitalization137.38M
First Farmers & Merchants
Price$43.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.76K
CapitalizationN/A
CWBC vs FFMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWBC vs. FFMH commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWBC is a Hold and FFMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CWBC: $18.74 vs. FFMH: $43.25)
Brand notoriety: CWBC and FFMH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWBC: 46% vs. FFMH: 137%
Market capitalization -- CWBC: $137.38M vs. FFMH: $0
CWBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $137.38M. FFMH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWBC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFFMH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FFMH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFMH is a better buy in the long-term than CWBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFMH’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FFMH’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWBC is a better buy in the short-term than FFMH.

Price Growth

CWBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.54% price change this week, while FFMH (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMH YTD gains are higher at: 25.331 vs. CWBC (-1.366).
CWBCFFMHCWBC / FFMH
Capitalization137MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.36625.331-5%
P/E Ratio19.11N/A-
Revenue48.2MN/A-
Total Cash1.86MN/A-
Total Debt90MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWBC vs FFMH: Fundamental Ratings
CWBC
FFMH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8198
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6235
SMR RATING
1..100
4949
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9157
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWBC's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFMH (63) in the null industry. This means that CWBC’s stock grew similarly to FFMH’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBC (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to CWBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBC (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to CWBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBC (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to CWBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWBC (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFMH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWBCFFMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFLYY1.490.04
+3.11%
Air France-KLM
KJFI0.18N/A
N/A
Comjoyful International Co
RSGUF4.11N/A
-0.12%
Rogers Sugar Inc.
TRMLF42.04-0.05
-0.12%
Tourmaline Oil Corp.
BHLL0.08-0.01
-6.59%
Bunker Hill Mining Corp.

CWBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWBC has been closely correlated with FFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWBC jumps, then FFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWBC
1D Price
Change %
CWBC100%
-0.79%
FFIN - CWBC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
WSFS - CWBC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
UCB - CWBC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
SFNC - CWBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
BHLB - CWBC
84%
Closely correlated
-2.02%
More

FFMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMH and PONT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMH and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMH
1D Price
Change %
FFMH100%
N/A
PONT - FFMH
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - FFMH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCB - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
CWBC - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
NBGRY - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
More