It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CWBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFBP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CWBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFBP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CWBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.74% price change this week, while MFBP (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.
CWBC is expected to report earnings on Apr 26, 2024.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CWBC | MFBP | CWBC / MFBP | |
Capitalization | 137M | 6.09M | 2,248% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -8.085 | 24.206 | -33% |
P/E Ratio | 19.11 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 48.2M | 11.5M | 419% |
Total Cash | 1.86M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 90M | 864K | 10,417% |
CWBC | MFBP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MFBP's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBC (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFBP’s stock grew similarly to CWBC’s over the last 12 months.
MFBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWBC (80) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWBC’s over the last 12 months.
CWBC's SMR Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFBP (51) in the null industry. This means that CWBC’s stock grew similarly to MFBP’s over the last 12 months.
MFBP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBC (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFBP’s stock grew similarly to CWBC’s over the last 12 months.
CWBC's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFBP (9) in the null industry. This means that CWBC’s stock grew similarly to MFBP’s over the last 12 months.
CWBC | MFBP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | 1 day ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago56% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago53% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago69% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 4 days ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWBC has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWBC jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CWBC | 100% | -4.07% | ||
THFF - CWBC | 74% Closely correlated | -5.39% | ||
RBCAA - CWBC | 73% Closely correlated | -6.11% | ||
TRST - CWBC | 72% Closely correlated | -5.72% | ||
SHBI - CWBC | 72% Closely correlated | -5.75% | ||
BUSE - CWBC | 72% Closely correlated | -5.64% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MFBP and HOMB have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFBP and HOMB's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MFBP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MFBP | 100% | N/A | ||
HOMB - MFBP | 29% Poorly correlated | -4.77% | ||
PGC - MFBP | 27% Poorly correlated | -6.43% | ||
QCRH - MFBP | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.28% | ||
THFF - MFBP | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.39% | ||
CWBC - MFBP | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.07% | ||
More |