CWBK
Price
$35.59
Change
-$0.16 (-0.45%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
105.75M
SCGLY
Price
$12.99
Change
-$0.64 (-4.70%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
52.92B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWBK vs SCGLY

Header iconCWBK vs SCGLY Comparison
Open Charts CWBK vs SCGLYBanner chart's image
CW Ban
Price$35.59
Change-$0.16 (-0.45%)
Volume$17.27K
Capitalization105.75M
Societe Generale
Price$12.99
Change-$0.64 (-4.70%)
Volume$397.45K
Capitalization52.92B
CWBK vs SCGLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWBK vs. SCGLY commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWBK is a Buy and SCGLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CWBK: $35.59 vs. SCGLY: $12.99)
Brand notoriety: CWBK and SCGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWBK: 666% vs. SCGLY: 105%
Market capitalization -- CWBK: $105.75M vs. SCGLY: $52.92B
CWBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $105.75M. SCGLY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWBK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CWBK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SCGLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWBK is a better buy in the long-term than SCGLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWBK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCGLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWBK is a better buy in the short-term than SCGLY.

Price Growth

CWBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.25% price change this week, while SCGLY (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCGLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.89% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCGLY($52.9B) has a higher market cap than CWBK($106M). SCGLY has higher P/E ratio than CWBK: SCGLY (9.28) vs CWBK (8.22). SCGLY YTD gains are higher at: 140.498 vs. CWBK (1.209). CWBK has less debt than SCGLY: CWBK (52.8M) vs SCGLY (173B). SCGLY has higher revenues than CWBK: SCGLY (54.2B) vs CWBK (47.5M).
CWBKSCGLYCWBK / SCGLY
Capitalization106M52.9B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.209140.4981%
P/E Ratio8.229.2889%
Revenue47.5M54.2B0%
Total Cash237MN/A-
Total Debt52.8M173B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWBK vs SCGLY: Fundamental Ratings
CWBK
SCGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
580
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
159
SMR RATING
1..100
455
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2553
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
38n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWBK's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCGLY (62). This means that CWBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCGLY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBK (15). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew similarly to CWBK’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLY's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWBK (45). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWBK’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBK (50). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew similarly to CWBK’s over the last 12 months.

CWBK's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLY (53). This means that CWBK’s stock grew similarly to SCGLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWBKSCGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADMLF4.140.04
+0.98%
Adriatic Metals PLC
BREUF10.83N/A
N/A
Bridgemarq Real Estate Svc Inc.
GRAM0.04N/A
N/A
Gold Flora Corporation
BRRLY13.02-0.13
-1.03%
Barry Callebaut AG
WFAFY29.86-1.11
-3.60%
Wesfarmers Ltd.

CWBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWBK and AMAL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWBK and AMAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWBK
1D Price
Change %
CWBK100%
-0.45%
AMAL - CWBK
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
NODB - CWBK
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.00%
PCB - CWBK
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
AROW - CWBK
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
SCGLY - CWBK
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
More

SCGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGLY has been closely correlated with BNPQY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCGLY jumps, then BNPQY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGLY
1D Price
Change %
SCGLY100%
-4.70%
BNPQY - SCGLY
72%
Closely correlated
-5.04%
ISNPY - SCGLY
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
CRARY - SCGLY
62%
Loosely correlated
-4.02%
KBCSY - SCGLY
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
UNCRY - SCGLY
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
More