CWD
Price
$2.08
Change
-$0.30 (-12.61%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.75M
61 days until earnings call
TNYZF
Price
$0.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
144.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWD vs TNYZF

Header iconCWD vs TNYZF Comparison
Open Charts CWD vs TNYZFBanner chart's image
CaliberCos
Price$2.08
Change-$0.30 (-12.61%)
Volume$428.34K
Capitalization2.75M
Tiny
Price$0.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.5K
Capitalization144.36M
CWD vs TNYZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWD vs. TNYZF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWD is a Buy and TNYZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CWD: $2.08 vs. TNYZF: $0.62)
Brand notoriety: CWD and TNYZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWD: 6% vs. TNYZF: 51%
Market capitalization -- CWD: $2.75M vs. TNYZF: $144.36M
CWD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.75M. TNYZF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $144.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNYZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TNYZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CWD and TNYZF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNYZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TNYZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWD is a better buy in the short-term than TNYZF.

Price Growth

CWD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -40.06% price change this week, while TNYZF (@Investment Managers) price change was -7.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNYZF($144M) has a higher market cap than CWD($2.75M). TNYZF YTD gains are higher at: -44.815 vs. CWD (-85.122). TNYZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.8M vs. CWD (-11M). TNYZF has more cash in the bank: 26.7M vs. CWD (683K). CWD has less debt than TNYZF: CWD (64.4M) vs TNYZF (148M). TNYZF has higher revenues than CWD: TNYZF (192M) vs CWD (32.3M).
CWDTNYZFCWD / TNYZF
Capitalization2.75M144M2%
EBITDA-11M17.8M-62%
Gain YTD-85.122-44.815190%
P/E RatioN/A43.04-
Revenue32.3M192M17%
Total Cash683K26.7M3%
Total Debt64.4M148M44%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWDTNYZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNYZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRLCF476.205.70
+1.21%
L'Oreal Co.
CGIUF2.10N/A
N/A
ESR REIT
BMBN31.25N/A
N/A
Benchmark Bankshares, Inc.
SEOFF11.05N/A
N/A
Stora Enso Oyj
CMRZF0.08N/A
-5.85%
Commerce Resources Corp.

CWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWD and BRSGF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWD and BRSGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWD
1D Price
Change %
CWD100%
-12.61%
BRSGF - CWD
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGE - CWD
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
KBDC - CWD
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
CRBG - CWD
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
BENF - CWD
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
More

TNYZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNYZF and ALTI have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNYZF and ALTI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNYZF
1D Price
Change %
TNYZF100%
+0.07%
ALTI - TNYZF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
CWD - TNYZF
5%
Poorly correlated
-12.61%
SFES - TNYZF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.19%
BAM - TNYZF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
PWM - TNYZF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More