Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MVGBX
CWGCX vs MVGBX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MVGBX
CWGCX vs MVGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MVGBX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and MVGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MVGBX (292M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than MVGBX: CWGCX (0.75) vs MVGBX (0.57). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MVGBX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MVGBX (13 years). MVGBX (1.77) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGBX (31.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVGBX: CWGCX (250) vs MVGBX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.44 vs. MVGBX (0.05). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.85 vs. MVGBX (12.01).
| CWGCX | MVGBX | CWGCX / MVGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.74 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.77 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.328 | 2.464 | 622% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 292M | 54,795% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.57 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.44 | 0.05 | 40,918% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.62 | 16.85 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.85 | 12.01 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.24 | 60.98 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement