Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGESX
CWGCX vs RGESX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGESX
CWGCX vs RGESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGESX commentary
Jun 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and RGESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGESX (3.83B). RGESX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: RGESX (0.85) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGESX: CWGCX (25 years) vs RGESX (19 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGESX (1.01). RGESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). RGESX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: RGESX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.58 vs. RGESX (11.77). RGESX return over 5 years is better than : 31.49 vs. CWGCX (27.16).
| CWGCX | RGESX | CWGCX / RGESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.98 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.01 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.567 | 7.168 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 3.83B | 4,178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.85 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.58 | 11.77 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.04 | 42.62 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.16 | 31.49 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.97 | 31.96 | 307% |