Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGESX
CWGCX vs RGESX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGESX
CWGCX vs RGESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGESX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a StrongBuy and RGESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. RGESX (3.96B). RGESX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: RGESX (0.84) vs CWGCX (0.72). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGESX: CWGCX (25 years) vs RGESX (20 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGESX (1.01). RGESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). RGESX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: RGESX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.99 vs. RGESX (12.14). RGESX return over 5 years is better than : 35.50 vs. CWGCX (30.23).
| CWGCX | RGESX | CWGCX / RGESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.98 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.01 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.624 | 12.993 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 3.96B | 3,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.84 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.99 | 12.14 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.38 | 49.16 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.23 | 35.50 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.90 | 27.68 | 325% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement