Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs WIMVX
CWGFX vs WIMVX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs WIMVX
CWGFX vs WIMVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. WIMVX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and WIMVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. WIMVX (37.3M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than WIMVX: CWGFX (1.30) vs WIMVX (0.27). CWGFX was incepted earlier than WIMVX: CWGFX (25 years) vs WIMVX (19 years). WIMVX (1.58) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WIMVX (22.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WIMVX: CWGFX (250) vs WIMVX (250000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. WIMVX (11.83). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.88 vs. WIMVX (29.54).
| CWGFX | WIMVX | CWGFX / WIMVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.78 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.58 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.611 | 12.834 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 37.3M | 428,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.27 | 487% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | 11.83 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.83 | 37.84 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.88 | 29.54 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.83 | 54.78 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers