Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs WIMVX
CWGFX vs WIMVX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs WIMVX
CWGFX vs WIMVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. WIMVX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and WIMVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. WIMVX (35M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than WIMVX: CWGFX (1.29) vs WIMVX (0.26). CWGFX was incepted earlier than WIMVX: CWGFX (26 years) vs WIMVX (19 years). WIMVX (1.58) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WIMVX (22.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WIMVX: CWGFX (250) vs WIMVX (250000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. WIMVX (8.89). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. WIMVX (23.62).
| CWGFX | WIMVX | CWGFX / WIMVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.78 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.58 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 14.815 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 35M | 451,429% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.26 | 501% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 8.89 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 38.54 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 23.62 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | 50.48 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement