Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs WTMVX
CWGFX vs WTMVX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs WTMVX
CWGFX vs WTMVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. WTMVX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and WTMVX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. WTMVX (37.4M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than WTMVX: CWGFX (1.30) vs WTMVX (0.25). CWGFX was incepted earlier than WTMVX: CWGFX (25 years) vs WTMVX (38 years). WTMVX (1.51) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WTMVX (22.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTMVX: CWGFX (250) vs WTMVX (2500). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.82 vs. WTMVX (14.93). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.16 vs. WTMVX (31.63).
| CWGFX | WTMVX | CWGFX / WTMVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.89 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.51 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.610 | 13.729 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 37.4M | 427,807% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.25 | 527% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.82 | 14.93 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.10 | 40.61 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.16 | 31.63 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.39 | 56.28 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers