Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs WTMVX
CWGFX vs WTMVX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs WTMVX
CWGFX vs WTMVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. WTMVX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and WTMVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. WTMVX (34.6M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than WTMVX: CWGFX (1.29) vs WTMVX (0.24). CWGFX was incepted earlier than WTMVX: CWGFX (26 years) vs WTMVX (38 years). WTMVX (1.51) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WTMVX (22.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTMVX: CWGFX (250) vs WTMVX (2500). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.30 vs. WTMVX (7.90). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.40 vs. WTMVX (23.26).
| CWGFX | WTMVX | CWGFX / WTMVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.89 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.51 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.352 | 14.153 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 34.6M | 456,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.24 | 543% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | 7.90 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.08 | 38.57 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.40 | 23.26 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.57 | 48.63 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers