CWK
Price
$10.23
Change
+$0.05 (+0.49%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.38B
55 days until earnings call
FOR
Price
$19.52
Change
-$0.20 (-1.01%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.99B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWK vs FOR

Header iconCWK vs FOR Comparison
Open Charts CWK vs FORBanner chart's image
Cushman & Wakefield
Price$10.23
Change+$0.05 (+0.49%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.38B
Forestar Group
Price$19.52
Change-$0.20 (-1.01%)
Volume$761
Capitalization1.99B
CWK vs FOR Comparison Chart
Loading...
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWK vs. FOR commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWK is a Hold and FOR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CWK: $10.18 vs. FOR: $19.72)
Brand notoriety: CWK and FOR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWK: 55% vs. FOR: 92%
Market capitalization -- CWK: $2.38B vs. FOR: $1.99B
CWK [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $2.38B. FOR’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CWK and FOR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FOR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CWK and FOR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CWK (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while FOR (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

FOR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.64% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWK($2.38B) has a higher market cap than FOR($1.99B). CWK has higher P/E ratio than FOR: CWK (30.67) vs FOR (10.84). CWK YTD gains are higher at: -22.171 vs. FOR (-23.920). CWK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 494M vs. FOR (230M). CWK has more cash in the bank: 768M vs. FOR (459M). FOR has less debt than CWK: FOR (714M) vs CWK (3.57B). CWK has higher revenues than FOR: CWK (9.49B) vs FOR (1.53B).
CWKFORCWK / FOR
Capitalization2.38B1.99B120%
EBITDA494M230M215%
Gain YTD-22.171-23.92093%
P/E Ratio30.6710.84283%
Revenue9.49B1.53B622%
Total Cash768M459M167%
Total Debt3.57B714M499%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWK vs FOR: Fundamental Ratings
CWK
FOR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1162
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
6964
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6282
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10082
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOR's Valuation (71) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (82). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (100). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's SMR Rating (64) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (69). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FOR (82). This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (100). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWKFOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNGBX54.89N/A
N/A
American Funds New Economy R2
GVEYX18.80N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds Value Equity Instl
CHTTX20.49N/A
N/A
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value N
FWTFX33.59N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
LMVVX26.71N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value R5

CWK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWK has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWK jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWK
1D Price
Change %
CWK100%
-0.88%
JLL - CWK
84%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
NMRK - CWK
79%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
CBRE - CWK
79%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
MMI - CWK
73%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
CIGI - CWK
69%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
More