CBRE Group (CBRE) and Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) operate in the commercial real estate services sector, providing brokerage, advisory, property management, and investment services to clients worldwide. This comparison examines their business models, recent financial results, and stock performance to assist institutional investors, active traders, and portfolio managers evaluating relative positioning within the industry. The analysis draws on verifiable developments from the past several weeks, including earnings reports and market movements, to highlight contrasts in scale, growth drivers, and risk profiles. Such insights are particularly relevant for those seeking exposure to real estate services amid evolving economic conditions and shifting capital allocation trends.
CBRE Group (CBRE) is the world's largest commercial real estate services and investment firm, offering a broad range of services including leasing, property management, capital markets, and facilities management across global markets. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near elevated levels following the company's Q1 2026 earnings release, which highlighted revenue of $10.5 billion, up 19% year-over-year, and core EPS of $1.61, exceeding expectations. Management cited strength in resilient business segments and early contributions from data center and infrastructure projects. The firm also raised its 2026 core EPS outlook and continued share repurchases exceeding $500 million year-to-date. These factors have supported positive sentiment and relative stability in price behavior amid broader market conditions.
Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) is a global provider of commercial real estate services, including agency leasing, occupier services, asset management, and valuation advisory, with operations spanning multiple continents. Recent market activity shows the stock around the $12–13 range, with year-to-date returns exceeding 21% as of late July 2026. The company reported Q1 2026 results that surpassed revenue forecasts, driven by 9–11% growth in certain segments, and maintains an upcoming Q2 2026 earnings release scheduled for early August. Initiatives such as debt refinancing and leadership appointments in sustainability have contributed to operational focus. Price movements reflect ongoing sector dynamics, with periods of volatility tied to macroeconomic signals and transaction volumes.
Tickeron maintains a curated section known as Trending AI Robots, which features select AI-powered trading bots from a library of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions—based on factors such as historical performance metrics, risk-adjusted returns, and alignment with current volatility or trend environments—earn placement in this highlighted area. Available bots encompass diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and ticker sets, with performance statistics that can vary widely depending on parameters like win rates, drawdowns, and trade frequency. This resource provides traders with data-driven options for automated strategies. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and configuration details.
CBRE Group (CBRE) operates at a significantly larger scale than Cushman & Wakefield (CWK), with greater revenue and a more diversified service mix that includes substantial infrastructure exposure. Growth drivers differ, as CBRE has highlighted momentum in data center development and related projects, while CWK emphasizes operational efficiency and balance sheet management through debt actions. Recent momentum favors CBRE following its pronounced Q1 earnings beat and guidance uplift, whereas CWK has delivered solid but comparatively modest revenue outperformance. Risk factors include shared exposure to commercial real estate cycles and interest rates, though CBRE's larger market capitalization may offer relative liquidity advantages. Sector sentiment remains constructive for both amid recovering transaction activity, yet CBRE exhibits more consistent positioning in investor attention during recent periods.
Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency, revenue trajectory, and relative price stability in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to CBRE Group (CBRE) over Cushman & Wakefield (CWK). The larger firm's demonstrated ability to exceed estimates and raise guidance supports a more favorable trend profile, while CWK shows solid fundamentals with somewhat greater variability in positioning. This assessment reflects data-driven pattern recognition rather than certainty and should be weighed alongside individual portfolio objectives.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCWK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +5.27% price change this week, while CWK (@Real Estate Development) price change was +5.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.03%.
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
CWK is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CBRE | CWK | CBRE / CWK | |
| Capitalization | 42.5B | 3.14B | 1,352% |
| EBITDA | 2.05B | 502M | 408% |
| Gain YTD | -8.695 | -17.109 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.59 | 41.94 | 80% |
| Revenue | 43.7B | 10.5B | 416% |
| Total Cash | 1.49B | 601M | 248% |
| Total Debt | 10.6B | 3.12B | 340% |
CBRE | CWK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CWK's Valuation (87) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (88). This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWK (100). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWK’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (55) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (87). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (59). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.
CWK's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBRE (77). This means that CWK’s stock grew significantly faster than CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | CWK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 54% | 12 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 69% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | 100% | -1.77% | ||
| JLL - CBRE | 88% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| NMRK - CBRE | 84% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| CWK - CBRE | 82% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| CIGI - CBRE | 72% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| MMI - CBRE | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWK has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWK jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWK | 100% | -2.61% | ||
| CBRE - CWK | 82% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| NMRK - CWK | 82% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| JLL - CWK | 82% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| CIGI - CWK | 67% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| MMI - CWK | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
More | ||||