CBRE Group and Cushman & Wakefield are two of the most prominent publicly traded commercial real estate services companies, yet they occupy different tiers of the industry. Comparing CBRE and CWK is useful for investors weighing scale, growth, and valuation trade-offs within the same sector. CBRE is a diversified, S&P 500–listed global leader, while CWK is a smaller, more leveraged turnaround story. This stock comparison examines their relative performance, market positioning, and the observable factors that could drive their next moves.
CBRE Group, Inc. is the world's largest commercial real estate services and investment company by revenue, headquartered in Dallas and employing more than 155,000 people across over 100 countries. It operates through four segments: Advisory Services (leasing, sales, and mortgage services), Building Operations & Experience (facilities and property management, plus data center solutions), Project Management, and Real Estate Investments.
In recent quarters, CBRE has reported accelerating results. Second-quarter revenue rose roughly 15% year over year to about $11.2 billion, with core earnings per share (EPS, a measure of profit per share) exceeding analyst estimates. Growth has been driven by record leasing activity and surging critical infrastructure services, including a roughly 68% increase in infrastructure revenue tied to data centers and the Pearce Services acquisition completed in late 2025. Management raised its full-year earnings outlook, reflecting confidence in advisory and building operations momentum.
Despite strong fundamentals, CBRE shares have pulled back in recent market activity, with the stock down roughly 10% over the past month and lower on a year-to-date basis, even as its three-year total return remains strong. Interest-rate volatility affecting transaction volumes and softer investment-management fundraising are among the factors weighing on sentiment.
Cushman & Wakefield is a Chicago-based global commercial real estate services firm operating across the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. Its business spans services, leasing, capital markets, and valuation, with a growing focus on higher-value lines such as project management and data center–related advisory work.
In recent quarters, CWK has delivered steady improvement. Revenue grew about 11% year over year in the most recent quarters, and adjusted EPS rose sharply, supported by record first-quarter leasing revenue and a sixth consecutive quarter of double-digit capital-markets growth. The company has also made progress on its balance sheet, redeeming a portion of its senior secured notes and reducing net leverage to about 3.1 times, with a stated target of 2 times by 2028.
Still, CWK shares have lagged recently, declining over the past month and on a one-year basis despite a strong three-year total return. The stock's smaller scale, cyclical capital-markets exposure, and higher debt load relative to peers are key factors investors are weighing alongside its attractive valuation.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of automated trading strategies. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the best-performing and most suitable strategies for current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, timeframes, strategies, performance statistics, and ticker universes, giving users a broad view of how algorithmic approaches are navigating today's markets. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help traders identify which automated strategies are currently aligned with prevailing trends.
Business model and scale. Both firms earn fees from leasing, capital markets, and management services, but CBRE is dramatically larger, with a diversified investment-management and development arm that CWK does not match in size. CWK is more focused on pure service lines and is repositioning toward higher-value offerings.
Growth drivers. Both are benefiting from AI-related demand, particularly data center services and industrial leasing. CBRE has a more established data center solutions platform and stronger absolute growth, while CWK is leveraging 50 technical data center projects in Asia-Pacific and recent talent hires to scale.
Risk factors and financial position. CWK carries a materially higher leverage ratio and greater sensitivity to cyclical capital-markets fees. CBRE maintains a conservative balance sheet with lower net leverage and substantial liquidity, giving it more flexibility for buybacks and acquisitions.
Valuation and sentiment. CWK trades at a lower forward earnings multiple, while CBRE commands a premium consistent with its scale and stability. Both have pulled back recently, with analysts maintaining generally positive ratings on each name.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward CBRE for its stronger trend consistency, broader diversification, lower leverage, and clearer growth catalysts in data center and infrastructure services. CWK, by contrast, presents a higher-risk, higher-reward profile tied to its deleveraging progress and valuation discount. The AI's preference would favor stability and relative positioning rather than a definitive outcome, and the most suitable choice depends on a trader's risk tolerance and timeframe.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The 10-day moving average for CBRE crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 11, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 11 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CBRE as a result. In 52 of 80 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CBRE just turned positive on October 30, 2026. Looking at past instances where CBRE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
CBRE moved above its 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +6.35% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CBRE advanced for three days, in 205 of 314 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
CBRE may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 35 of 70 cases where CBRE's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 50%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CBRE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
The Aroon Indicator for CBRE entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CBRE’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 83 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.673) is normal, around the industry mean (2.188). P/E Ratio (30.798) is within average values for comparable stocks, (54.152). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.695) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.107) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.944) is also within normal values, averaging (5.807).
The 10-day moving average for CWK crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 03, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 16 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 21, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CWK as a result. In 65 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CWK just turned positive on October 20, 2026. Looking at past instances where CWK's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
CWK moved above its 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +9.31% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CWK advanced for three days, in 199 of 294 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 129 of 202 cases where CWK Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 64%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for CWK moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 32 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 26 of the 32 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 81%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 48 of 58 cases where CWK's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CWK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.
CWK broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 3 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CWK’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 79 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.621) is normal, around the industry mean (2.188). P/E Ratio (48.138) is within average values for comparable stocks, (54.152). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.220) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.107) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.274) is also within normal values, averaging (5.807).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CWK’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
CBRE | CWK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CWK's Valuation (79) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (83). This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWK (100). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWK’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (54) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (86). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.
CWK's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (57). This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CWK's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBRE (79). This means that CWK’s stock grew significantly faster than CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | CWK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 65% | 10 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 64% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CWK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -4.63% price change this week, while CWK (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -7.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.64%.
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2027.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| JLL - CBRE | 86% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| CWK - CBRE | 84% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| NMRK - CBRE | 78% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| CIGI - CBRE | 71% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| MMI - CBRE | 69% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWK has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWK jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWK | 100% | -0.79% | ||
| CBRE - CWK | 85% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| JLL - CWK | 82% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| NMRK - CWK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| MMI - CWK | 69% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| CIGI - CWK | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||