Advertisement
CBRE vs CWK
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) vs. Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CBRE boasts a significantly larger market capitalization of $45 billion compared to CWK's $3.5 billion, reflecting greater scale in commercial real estate services.
- CWK has shown stronger recent momentum with year-to-date gains of 8.3% versus CBRE's 5.1%, and one-year returns of 79% compared to 30%.
- Both firms reported record Q4 2025 revenues—CBRE at $11.6 billion (up 12%) and CWK at $2.91 billion—amid stabilizing commercial real estate demand.
- CBRE benefits from partnerships like one with Meta for data center labor, while CWK focuses on debt reduction and leasing growth.
- Relative performance highlights CWK's outperformance in shorter timeframes, but CBRE offers more stability with lower volatility.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits CBRE Group, Inc. against Cushman & Wakefield (CWK), two prominent players in the commercial real estate services sector. Both companies provide brokerage, property management, and advisory services, making them sensitive to office, industrial, and data center market trends. Investors and traders interested in real estate recovery amid interest rate shifts and economic stabilization will find value here. Recent quarters have shown robust revenue growth for both, driven by leasing and capital markets activity, offering insights into relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning in today's environment. (98 words)
CBRE Overview and Recent Performance
CBRE Group, Inc. is the world's largest commercial real estate services firm, with operations spanning advisory, brokerage, facilities management (FM), and investment management across more than 100 countries. In recent market activity, its shares have traded around $152, with year-to-date gains of 5.1% and a 52-week range of $116–$174. The stock's performance reflects steady momentum, supported by record Q4 2025 revenue of $11.6 billion, up 12% year-over-year, and strong core earnings per share (EPS, a measure of profitability per share). Sentiment has been bolstered by strategic moves like a partnership with Meta to tackle data center skilled labor shortages, though recent insider selling tempers optimism ahead of Q1 2026 earnings on April 23. Broader influences include rising industrial and data center leasing demand offsetting softer office segments.
CWK Overview and Recent Performance
Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) is a leading global commercial real estate services provider, offering leasing, sales, valuation, and project management services. Its shares recently hovered near $14.85, delivering year-to-date returns of 8.3% and impressive one-year gains of 79%, within a 52-week range of $7.82–$17.40. Recent performance stems from record Q4 2025 revenue of $2.91 billion and full-year profit of $88 million, fueled by capital markets and leasing growth. Positive sentiment arises from $500 million in debt reduction over two years and steady service line fee revenue expansion. Influences include resilient industrial demand and property sales recovery, though exposure to office markets adds volatility in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from among hundreds available, each designed to trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like swing trading or semiconductors-focused. Currently featuring 25 bots, standout performers display annualized returns up to 97%, win rates of 58–69%, profit factors around 1.5–3.6, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 4 in many cases, with average trade durations from 1 day to 8 days and drawdowns typically under $25,000. These metrics highlight bots suited to current volatility. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify strategies aligning with your trading approach.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CBRE and CWK operate in commercial real estate services, emphasizing brokerage and leasing, but CBRE's vast global footprint and diversified FM segment provide broader revenue stability versus CWK's focus on core brokerage. Growth drivers include data center and industrial leasing for both, though CBRE edges in scale with $40.6 billion trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue against $10.3 billion. Recent momentum favors CWK with superior short-term returns, but CBRE shows trend consistency. Risk factors: CWK faces higher beta (volatility measure) and debt sensitivity, while CBRE contends with office exposure. Sector-wise, both benefit from capital markets rebound; market sentiment leans positive on recovery but cautious on economic slowdowns.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CBRE based on its superior long-term trend consistency, larger market positioning, and upcoming catalysts like Q1 earnings growth expectations. While CWK exhibits stronger near-term momentum, CBRE's scale and stability offer higher probability of sustained outperformance in the prevailing real estate services landscape.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBRE is a Hold and CWK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCWK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CBRE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CWK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBRE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- CWK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -0.27% price change this week, while CWK (@Real Estate Development) price change was -2.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +4.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
CWK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (+4.26% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CBRE | CWK | CBRE / CWK | |
| Capitalization | 38.5B | 3.02B | 1,274% |
| EBITDA | 2B | 502M | 398% |
| Gain YTD | -18.185 | -20.321 | 89% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.03 | 40.31 | 75% |
| Revenue | 42.2B | 10.5B | 402% |
| Total Cash | 1.66B | 601M | 277% |
| Total Debt | 10.4B | 3.12B | 333% |
CBRE | CWK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 32 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CWK's Valuation (83) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (86). This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWK (100). This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWK’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (88). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.
CWK's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (59). This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
CWK's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBRE (78). This means that CWK’s stock grew significantly faster than CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | CWK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 17 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
CBRE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| JLL - CBRE | 89% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| NMRK - CBRE | 84% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| CWK - CBRE | 83% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| CIGI - CBRE | 71% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| MMI - CBRE | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
More | ||||
CWK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWK has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWK jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWK | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| CBRE - CWK | 83% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| NMRK - CWK | 82% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| JLL - CWK | 82% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| CIGI - CWK | 66% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| MMI - CWK | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
More | ||||