CWK
Price
$8.96
Change
+$0.44 (+5.16%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.38B
4 days until earnings call
RMAX
Price
$7.39
Change
+$0.16 (+2.21%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
160.28M
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CWK vs RMAX

Header iconCWK vs RMAX Comparison
Open Charts CWK vs RMAXBanner chart's image
Cushman & Wakefield
Price$8.96
Change+$0.44 (+5.16%)
Volume$3.21M
Capitalization2.38B
Re/Max Holdings
Price$7.39
Change+$0.16 (+2.21%)
Volume$97.24K
Capitalization160.28M
CWK vs RMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWK vs. RMAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWK is a StrongBuy and RMAX is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CWK: $8.96 vs. RMAX: $7.39)
Brand notoriety: CWK and RMAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWK: 131% vs. RMAX: 60%
Market capitalization -- CWK: $2.38B vs. RMAX: $160.28M
CWK [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $2.38B. RMAX’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $160.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMAX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMAX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMAX is a better buy in the long-term than CWK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMAX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RMAX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWK is a better buy in the short-term than RMAX.

Price Growth

CWK (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +8.21% price change this week, while RMAX (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

RMAX is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.97% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWK($2.38B) has a higher market cap than RMAX($160M). RMAX has higher P/E ratio than CWK: RMAX (1111.11) vs CWK (30.67). RMAX (-30.740) and CWK (-31.498) have similar YTD gains . CWK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 494M vs. RMAX (26.6M). CWK has more cash in the bank: 768M vs. RMAX (82.6M). RMAX has less debt than CWK: RMAX (484M) vs CWK (3.57B). CWK has higher revenues than RMAX: CWK (9.49B) vs RMAX (326M).
CWKRMAXCWK / RMAX
Capitalization2.38B160M1,486%
EBITDA494M26.6M1,857%
Gain YTD-31.498-30.740102%
P/E Ratio30.671111.113%
Revenue9.49B326M2,912%
Total Cash768M82.6M930%
Total Debt3.57B484M737%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWK vs RMAX: Fundamental Ratings
CWK
RMAX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1955
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7888
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8865
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10070
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMAX's Valuation (36) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWK (81). This means that RMAX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWK’s over the last 12 months.

RMAX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (100). This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's SMR Rating (78) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RMAX (88). This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to RMAX’s over the last 12 months.

RMAX's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (88). This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

RMAX's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (100). This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWKRMAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIGEX16.680.42
+2.58%
Calamos Global Equity I
MAILX19.27N/A
N/A
BlackRock International Instl
DNLDX54.33N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Active MidCap A
ASVGX9.19N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Value R5
VDMCX9.23N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Developing Markets C

CWK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWK has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWK jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWK
1D Price
Change %
CWK100%
+5.16%
JLL - CWK
83%
Closely correlated
+2.69%
NMRK - CWK
80%
Closely correlated
+3.42%
CBRE - CWK
78%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
MMI - CWK
73%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
CIGI - CWK
66%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
More

RMAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMAX has been loosely correlated with EXPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMAX jumps, then EXPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMAX
1D Price
Change %
RMAX100%
+2.21%
EXPI - RMAX
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.33%
HOUS - RMAX
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
OPEN - RMAX
54%
Loosely correlated
-7.68%
CWK - RMAX
53%
Loosely correlated
+5.16%
RDFN - RMAX
51%
Loosely correlated
+7.43%
More