CWK
Price
$9.70
Change
+$0.07 (+0.73%)
Updated
May 23, 11:26 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.38B
69 days until earnings call
RMAX
Price
$7.09
Change
-$0.01 (-0.14%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
160.28M
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWK vs RMAX

Header iconCWK vs RMAX Comparison
Open Charts CWK vs RMAXBanner chart's image
Cushman & Wakefield
Price$9.70
Change+$0.07 (+0.73%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.38B
Re/Max Holdings
Price$7.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.14%)
Volume$126.85K
Capitalization160.28M
CWK vs RMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWK vs. RMAX commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWK is a Hold and RMAX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CWK: $9.62 vs. RMAX: $7.09)
Brand notoriety: CWK and RMAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWK: 57% vs. RMAX: 87%
Market capitalization -- CWK: $2.38B vs. RMAX: $160.28M
CWK [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $2.38B. RMAX’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $160.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMAX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMAX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMAX is a better buy in the long-term than CWK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMAX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RMAX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMAX is a better buy in the short-term than CWK.

Price Growth

CWK (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -9.07% price change this week, while RMAX (@Real Estate Development) price change was -8.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

RMAX is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.87% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWK($2.38B) has a higher market cap than RMAX($160M). RMAX has higher P/E ratio than CWK: RMAX (1111.11) vs CWK (30.67). CWK YTD gains are higher at: -26.453 vs. RMAX (-33.552). CWK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 494M vs. RMAX (26.6M). CWK has more cash in the bank: 768M vs. RMAX (82.6M). RMAX has less debt than CWK: RMAX (484M) vs CWK (3.57B). CWK has higher revenues than RMAX: CWK (9.49B) vs RMAX (326M).
CWKRMAXCWK / RMAX
Capitalization2.38B160M1,486%
EBITDA494M26.6M1,857%
Gain YTD-26.453-33.55279%
P/E Ratio30.671111.113%
Revenue9.49B326M2,912%
Total Cash768M82.6M930%
Total Debt3.57B484M737%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWK vs RMAX: Fundamental Ratings
CWK
RMAX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7963
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6987
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5964
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10088
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMAX's Valuation (35) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWK (81). This means that RMAX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWK’s over the last 12 months.

RMAX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (100). This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's SMR Rating (69) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RMAX (87). This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to RMAX’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RMAX (64). This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to RMAX’s over the last 12 months.

RMAX's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (100). This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWKRMAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEMLX15.26N/A
N/A
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity R
SFPIX11.96N/A
N/A
Saratoga Financial Services I
PINZX10.77N/A
N/A
Principal Overseas Instl
POGSX81.00N/A
N/A
Pin Oak Equity
HMDCX24.52N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap C

RMAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMAX has been loosely correlated with HOUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMAX jumps, then HOUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMAX
1D Price
Change %
RMAX100%
-0.14%
HOUS - RMAX
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
EXPI - RMAX
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CWK - RMAX
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
RDFN - RMAX
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
JLL - RMAX
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More