CWLPF
Price
$0.54
Change
+$0.04 (+8.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
14.99M
RANJF
Price
$37.40
Change
-$5.10 (-12.00%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
8.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWLPF vs RANJF

Header iconCWLPF vs RANJF Comparison
Open Charts CWLPF vs RANJFBanner chart's image
Caldwell Partners International
Price$0.54
Change+$0.04 (+8.00%)
Volume$6.75K
Capitalization14.99M
Randstad
Price$37.40
Change-$5.10 (-12.00%)
Volume$5.4K
Capitalization8.19B
CWLPF vs RANJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWLPF vs. RANJF commentary
Sep 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWLPF is a Hold and RANJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CWLPF: $0.54 vs. RANJF: $37.40)
Brand notoriety: CWLPF and RANJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWLPF: 25% vs. RANJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CWLPF: $14.99M vs. RANJF: $8.19B
CWLPF [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $14.99M. RANJF’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $8.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $78.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $1.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWLPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRANJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CWLPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RANJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CWLPF and RANJF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWLPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CWLPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CWLPF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +8.00% price change this week, while RANJF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +6.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+6.77% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RANJF($8.19B) has a higher market cap than CWLPF($15M). RANJF has higher P/E ratio than CWLPF: RANJF (74.03) vs CWLPF (37.21). RANJF YTD gains are higher at: -13.386 vs. CWLPF (-37.614). RANJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 558M vs. CWLPF (3.37M). RANJF has more cash in the bank: 278M vs. CWLPF (15.4M). CWLPF has less debt than RANJF: CWLPF (6.05M) vs RANJF (2.29B). RANJF has higher revenues than CWLPF: RANJF (23.5B) vs CWLPF (94.7M).
CWLPFRANJFCWLPF / RANJF
Capitalization15M8.19B0%
EBITDA3.37M558M1%
Gain YTD-37.614-13.386281%
P/E Ratio37.2174.0350%
Revenue94.7M23.5B0%
Total Cash15.4M278M6%
Total Debt6.05M2.29B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWLPF vs RANJF: Fundamental Ratings
CWLPF
RANJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7975
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RANJF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CWLPF (32). This means that RANJF’s stock grew similarly to CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

RANJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CWLPF (100). This means that RANJF’s stock grew similarly to CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

RANJF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CWLPF (89). This means that RANJF’s stock grew similarly to CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

RANJF's Price Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CWLPF (79). This means that RANJF’s stock grew similarly to CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

RANJF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CWLPF (3). This means that RANJF’s stock grew similarly to CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWLPFRANJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INHD5.190.18
+3.59%
Inno Holdings Inc
FRST11.450.33
+2.97%
Primis Financial Corp
TMO492.722.98
+0.61%
Thermo Fisher Scientific
BASE24.39-0.01
-0.04%
Couchbase
GTES25.56-0.58
-2.22%
Gates Industrial Corp

CWLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWLPF and RANJF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWLPF and RANJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWLPF
1D Price
Change %
CWLPF100%
+7.98%
RANJF - CWLPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHEXY - CWLPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
RANJY - CWLPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
RLBY - CWLPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAYPY - CWLPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RANJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RANJF and CWLPF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RANJF and CWLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RANJF
1D Price
Change %
RANJF100%
N/A
CWLPF - RANJF
26%
Poorly correlated
+7.98%
RANJY - RANJF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
BBSI - RANJF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
KFY - RANJF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
NSP - RANJF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
More