CWLPF
Price
$0.49
Change
-$0.01 (-2.00%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
14.93M
RLBY
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
10.91M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWLPF vs RLBY

Header iconCWLPF vs RLBY Comparison
Open Charts CWLPF vs RLBYBanner chart's image
Caldwell Partners International
Price$0.49
Change-$0.01 (-2.00%)
Volume$3.4K
Capitalization14.93M
Reliability
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization10.91M
CWLPF vs RLBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWLPF vs. RLBY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWLPF is a Hold and RLBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CWLPF: $0.49 vs. RLBY: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: CWLPF and RLBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWLPF: 17% vs. RLBY: 4%
Market capitalization -- CWLPF: $14.93M vs. RLBY: $10.91M
CWLPF [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $14.93M. RLBY’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $10.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $78.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $1.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWLPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRLBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CWLPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RLBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RLBY is a better buy in the long-term than CWLPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWLPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RLBY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWLPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RLBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RLBY is a better buy in the short-term than CWLPF.

Price Growth

CWLPF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RLBY (@Other Consumer Services) price change was -13.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (-2.51% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWLPF($14.9M) has a higher market cap than RLBY($10.9M). CWLPF YTD gains are higher at: -43.288 vs. RLBY (-47.655). CWLPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.37M vs. RLBY (-547K). CWLPF has more cash in the bank: 15.4M vs. RLBY (262K). RLBY has less debt than CWLPF: RLBY (70K) vs CWLPF (6.05M). CWLPF has higher revenues than RLBY: CWLPF (94.7M) vs RLBY (22.1M).
CWLPFRLBYCWLPF / RLBY
Capitalization14.9M10.9M137%
EBITDA3.37M-547K-616%
Gain YTD-43.288-47.65591%
P/E Ratio33.97N/A-
Revenue94.7M22.1M429%
Total Cash15.4M262K5,878%
Total Debt6.05M70K8,641%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWLPF vs RLBY: Fundamental Ratings
CWLPF
RLBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2199
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
310
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5029

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWLPF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as RLBY (50). This means that CWLPF’s stock grew similarly to RLBY’s over the last 12 months.

CWLPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RLBY (100). This means that CWLPF’s stock grew similarly to RLBY’s over the last 12 months.

CWLPF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as RLBY (95). This means that CWLPF’s stock grew similarly to RLBY’s over the last 12 months.

RLBY's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CWLPF (85). This means that RLBY’s stock grew similarly to CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

CWLPF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as RLBY (10). This means that CWLPF’s stock grew similarly to RLBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWLPFRLBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UFG7.690.14
+1.85%
Uni-Fuels Holdings Ltd
PRO22.930.02
+0.09%
Pros Holdings
OESX8.76-0.06
-0.68%
Orion Energy Systems Inc.
LEA100.26-1.42
-1.40%
Lear Corp
MDLZ62.56-1.83
-2.84%
Mondelez International

CWLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWLPF and RANJF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWLPF and RANJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWLPF
1D Price
Change %
CWLPF100%
N/A
RANJF - CWLPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHEXY - CWLPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
RANJY - CWLPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
RLBY - CWLPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAYPY - CWLPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RLBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RLBY and MPGPF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RLBY and MPGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RLBY
1D Price
Change %
RLBY100%
N/A
MPGPF - RLBY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWLPF - RLBY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAYPY - RLBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLNCF - RLBY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RANJY - RLBY
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
More