CWPS
Price
$23.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
IPHLF
Price
$4.42
Change
-$0.58 (-11.60%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Ad is loading...

CWPS vs IPHLF

Header iconCWPS vs IPHLF Comparison
Open Charts CWPS vs IPHLFBanner chart's image
Conwest Associates
Price$23.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
IPH
Price$4.42
Change-$0.58 (-11.60%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CWPS vs IPHLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CWPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWPS vs. IPHLF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWPS is a Buy and IPHLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CWPS: $23.75 vs. IPHLF: $4.42)
Brand notoriety: CWPS and IPHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWPS: 15% vs. IPHLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CWPS: $0 vs. IPHLF: $1.25B
CWPS [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $0. IPHLF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $1.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIPHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CWPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IPHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CWPS and IPHLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWPS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CWPS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CWPS (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +0.21% price change this week, while IPHLF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.30% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWPS YTD gains are higher at: 3.441 vs. IPHLF (-11.600).
CWPSIPHLFCWPS / IPHLF
CapitalizationN/A1.25B-
EBITDAN/A131M-
Gain YTD3.441-11.600-30%
P/E RatioN/A40.32-
RevenueN/A412M-
Total CashN/A88.4M-
Total DebtN/A161M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWPS: Fundamental Ratings
CWPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWPSIPHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CWPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTMRX20.47N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth R
GAGVX23.27N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity ESG A
MYIIX7.83-0.04
-0.51%
NYLI WMC International Research Eq Cl I
FCCGX26.07-0.31
-1.18%
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth C
AGGIX11.49-1.67
-12.71%
American Century Focused Global Gr I

CWPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWPS has been loosely correlated with IPHLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWPS jumps, then IPHLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWPS
1D Price
Change %
CWPS100%
N/A
IPHLF - CWPS
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BAH - CWPS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
TLPFY - CWPS
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
LZ - CWPS
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
MANOF - CWPS
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IPHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPHLF has been loosely correlated with CWPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPHLF jumps, then CWPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPHLF
1D Price
Change %
IPHLF100%
N/A
CWPS - IPHLF
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TLPFY - IPHLF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
TLPFF - IPHLF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
ADT - IPHLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
WBQNL - IPHLF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
More