CWSFF vs ESGL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWSFF is a Hold and ESGL is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CWSFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESGL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CWSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ESGL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESGL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- ESGL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CWSFF (@Environmental Services) experienced а -15.48% price change this week, while ESGL (@Environmental Services) price change was +2.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -5.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
ESGL is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (-5.45% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| CWSFF | ESGL | CWSFF / ESGL | |
| Capitalization | 30.9M | 5.46M | 566% |
| EBITDA | -33.13M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -76.580 | 165.761 | -46% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.33M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 10M | N/A | - |
| ESGL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BDRY | 8.50 | 0.05 | +0.59% |
| Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | |||
| SHY | 82.02 | 0.09 | +0.11% |
| iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| UMAR | 35.39 | -0.16 | -0.46% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Mar | |||
| XTN | 91.60 | -1.00 | -1.08% |
| SPDR® S&P Transportation ETF | |||
| VIOG | 122.24 | -1.44 | -1.17% |
| Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | |||
CWSFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CWSFF and CHFFY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWSFF and CHFFY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWSFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWSFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CHFFY - CWSFF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ESGL - CWSFF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| BTQNF - CWSFF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WCN - CWSFF | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CHFFF - CWSFF | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ESGL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ESGL and CWSFF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESGL and CWSFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESGL | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| CWSFF - ESGL | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VEOEY - ESGL | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
| GWAV - ESGL | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.51% | ||
| AMBI - ESGL | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.64% | ||
| QRHC - ESGL | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.61% | ||
More | ||||