CWSFF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.08 (+100.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
30.9M
ESGL
Price
$1.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.45M
Ad is loading...

CWSFF vs ESGL

Header iconCWSFF vs ESGL Comparison
Open Charts CWSFF vs ESGLBanner chart's image
CIELO WASTE SOLUTIONS
Price$0.15
Change+$0.08 (+100.00%)
Volume$666
Capitalization30.9M
ESGL Holdings
Price$1.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.74K
Capitalization5.45M
CWSFF vs ESGL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWSFF vs. ESGL commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWSFF is a Hold and ESGL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CWSFF: $0.16 vs. ESGL: $1.23)
Brand notoriety: CWSFF and ESGL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWSFF: 2% vs. ESGL: 32%
Market capitalization -- CWSFF: $30.9M vs. ESGL: $5.45M
CWSFF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $30.9M. ESGL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $5.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWSFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESGL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ESGL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESGL is a better buy in the long-term than CWSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWSFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESGL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWSFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ESGL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESGL is a better buy in the short-term than CWSFF.

Price Growth

CWSFF (@Environmental Services) experienced а +108.33% price change this week, while ESGL (@Environmental Services) price change was -12.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESGL is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.38% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWSFF($30.9M) has a higher market cap than ESGL($5.46M). CWSFF YTD gains are higher at: 107.775 vs. ESGL (-7.512).
CWSFFESGLCWSFF / ESGL
Capitalization30.9M5.46M566%
EBITDA-33.13MN/A-
Gain YTD107.775-7.512-1,435%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.33MN/A-
Total Debt10MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWSFFESGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FV61.080.70
+1.16%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
IDRV30.130.34
+1.14%
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
HLAL53.690.54
+1.02%
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
ANEW46.230.29
+0.63%
ProShares MSCI Trnsfmtnl Chngs ETF
ISEP27.780.02
+0.07%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Sept

CWSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWSFF and CHFFY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWSFF and CHFFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWSFF
1D Price
Change %
CWSFF100%
+93.75%
CHFFY - CWSFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESGL - CWSFF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTQNF - CWSFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCN - CWSFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
CHFFF - CWSFF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ESGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESGL and AMBI have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESGL and AMBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESGL
1D Price
Change %
ESGL100%
N/A
AMBI - ESGL
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWSFF - ESGL
13%
Poorly correlated
+93.75%
VEOEY - ESGL
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
LNZA - ESGL
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
GWAV - ESGL
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
More