CWSFF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.09 (-52.94%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
30.9M
ESGL
Price
$2.98
Change
-$0.02 (-0.67%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWSFF vs ESGL

Header iconCWSFF vs ESGL Comparison
Open Charts CWSFF vs ESGLBanner chart's image
CIELO WASTE SOLUTIONS
Price$0.07
Change-$0.09 (-52.94%)
Volume$25.39K
Capitalization30.9M
ESGL Holdings
Price$2.98
Change-$0.02 (-0.67%)
Volume$21.43K
Capitalization5.45M
CWSFF vs ESGL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWSFF vs. ESGL commentary
Jul 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWSFF is a Hold and ESGL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CWSFF: $0.08 vs. ESGL: $2.98)
Brand notoriety: CWSFF and ESGL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWSFF: 144% vs. ESGL: 32%
Market capitalization -- CWSFF: $30.9M vs. ESGL: $5.45M
CWSFF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $30.9M. ESGL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $5.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWSFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESGL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ESGL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESGL is a better buy in the long-term than CWSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWSFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESGL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWSFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ESGL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWSFF is a better buy in the short-term than ESGL.

Price Growth

CWSFF (@Environmental Services) experienced а +114.29% price change this week, while ESGL (@Environmental Services) price change was -2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +5.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESGL is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+5.67% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWSFF($30.9M) has a higher market cap than ESGL($5.46M). ESGL YTD gains are higher at: 124.077 vs. CWSFF (0.536).
CWSFFESGLCWSFF / ESGL
Capitalization30.9M5.46M566%
EBITDA-33.13MN/A-
Gain YTD0.536124.0770%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.33MN/A-
Total Debt10MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWSFF: Fundamental Ratings
CWSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWSFFESGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AKRBF24.500.30
+1.26%
Aker BP Asa
BTOW0.02N/A
N/A
GTFN Holdings Inc.
PRRCF9.29N/A
N/A
Procredit Holding Ag
QRNNF1.75N/A
N/A
Aurizon Holdings Ltd.
PVCT0.07N/A
-0.55%
Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.

CWSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWSFF and CHFFY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWSFF and CHFFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWSFF
1D Price
Change %
CWSFF100%
-54.76%
CHFFY - CWSFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESGL - CWSFF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
BTQNF - CWSFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
WCN - CWSFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
CHFFF - CWSFF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ESGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESGL and MEG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESGL and MEG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESGL
1D Price
Change %
ESGL100%
-0.67%
MEG - ESGL
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
CWSFF - ESGL
13%
Poorly correlated
-54.76%
VEOEY - ESGL
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
QRHC - ESGL
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.67%
LNZA - ESGL
9%
Poorly correlated
+42.50%
More