CWSFF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
WCN
Price
$182.43
Change
+$0.56 (+0.31%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CWSFF vs WCN

Header iconCWSFF vs WCN Comparison
Open Charts CWSFF vs WCNBanner chart's image
CIELO WASTE SOLUTIONS
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Waste Connections
Price$182.43
Change+$0.56 (+0.31%)
Volume$592.94K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CWSFF vs WCN Comparison Chart
Loading...
WCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CWSFF vs. WCN commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWSFF is a Hold and WCN is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CWSFF: $0.11 vs. WCN: $182.43)
Brand notoriety: CWSFF and WCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWSFF: 17% vs. WCN: 71%
Market capitalization -- CWSFF: $30.9M vs. WCN: $43.9B
CWSFF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $30.9M. WCN’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $43.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWSFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWCN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CWSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WCN is a better buy in the long-term than CWSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WCN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WCN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CWSFF (@Environmental Services) experienced а -0.96% price change this week, while WCN (@Environmental Services) price change was +1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

WCN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.03% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCN($43.9B) has a higher market cap than CWSFF($30.9M). WCN YTD gains are higher at: 22.827 vs. CWSFF (-82.609). WCN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.26B vs. CWSFF (-33.13M). WCN has more cash in the bank: 78.4M vs. CWSFF (1.33M). CWSFF has less debt than WCN: CWSFF (10M) vs WCN (7.02B). WCN has higher revenues than CWSFF: WCN (8.02B) vs CWSFF (0).
CWSFFWCNCWSFF / WCN
Capitalization30.9M43.9B0%
EBITDA-33.13M2.26B-1%
Gain YTD-82.60922.827-362%
P/E RatioN/A57.76-
Revenue08.02B-
Total Cash1.33M78.4M2%
Total Debt10M7.02B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WCN: Fundamental Ratings
WCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
WCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

CWSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWSFF and CHFFY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWSFF and CHFFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWSFF
1D Price
Change %
CWSFF100%
N/A
CHFFY - CWSFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESGL - CWSFF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
BTQNF - CWSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCN - CWSFF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
CHFFF - CWSFF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More