CX
Price
$9.40
Change
+$0.17 (+1.84%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
13.64B
52 days until earnings call
CXMSF
Price
$0.87
Change
-$0.04 (-4.40%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs CXMSF

Header iconCX vs CXMSF Comparison
Open Charts CX vs CXMSFBanner chart's image
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$9.40
Change+$0.17 (+1.84%)
Volume$11.45M
Capitalization13.64B
Cemex S.A.B de C.V
Price$0.87
Change-$0.04 (-4.40%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization12.66B
CX vs CXMSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. CXMSF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a StrongBuy and CXMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CX: $9.40 vs. CXMSF: $0.87)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. CXMSF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 92% vs. CXMSF: 0%
Market capitalization -- CX: $13.64B vs. CXMSF: $12.66B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $13.64B. CXMSF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $12.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCXMSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CXMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CX and CXMSF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CXMSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CXMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CX is a better buy in the short-term than CXMSF.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.41% price change this week, while CXMSF (@Construction Materials) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.34% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($13.6B) has a higher market cap than CXMSF($12.7B). CX has higher P/E ratio than CXMSF: CX (15.23) vs CXMSF (14.40). CX (67.781) and CXMSF (64.597) have similar YTD gains . CX (1.76B) and CXMSF (1.76B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CX (1.17B) and CXMSF (1.17B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CX (7.36B) and CXMSF (7.36B) have identical debt. CX (15.7B) and CXMSF (15.7B) have equivalent revenues.
CXCXMSFCX / CXMSF
Capitalization13.6B12.7B107%
EBITDA1.76B1.76B100%
Gain YTD67.78164.597105%
P/E Ratio15.2314.40106%
Revenue15.7B15.7B100%
Total Cash1.17B1.17B100%
Total Debt7.36B7.36B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs CXMSF: Fundamental Ratings
CX
CXMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3080
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4244
SMR RATING
1..100
6363
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9798
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CX's Valuation (20) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CXMSF (20) in the null industry. This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CXMSF (44) in the null industry. This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CX's SMR Rating (63) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CXMSF (63) in the null industry. This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CXMSF (41) in the null industry. This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CX's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CXMSF (98) in the null industry. This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXCXMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ION36.280.90
+2.55%
ProShares S&P Global Cor Btty Mtls ETF
KGRN28.760.58
+2.05%
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Tech ETF
YSPY19.840.08
+0.41%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF
HAWX36.630.06
+0.15%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI ACWI exUS ETF
SMIG29.820.01
+0.03%
Bahl & Gaynor Sm/Md Cp Inc Gr ETF

CXMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXMSF and CX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXMSF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXMSF
1D Price
Change %
CXMSF100%
N/A
CX - CXMSF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
WBRBY - CXMSF
17%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
XYIGY - CXMSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.12%
SDCVF - CXMSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRKWF - CXMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More