Ad is loading...
CX
Price
$5.47
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
80 days until earnings call
GCWOF
Price
$8.92
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
Ad is loading...

CX vs GCWOF

Header iconCX vs GCWOF Comparison
Open Charts CX vs GCWOFBanner chart's image
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$5.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$44.65K
CapitalizationN/A
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua SAB de CV
Price$8.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.44K
CapitalizationN/A
CX vs GCWOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. GCWOF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Sell and GCWOF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CX: $5.47 vs. GCWOF: $8.92)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. GCWOF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 84% vs. GCWOF: 498%
Market capitalization -- CX: $13.14B vs. GCWOF: $3.19B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $13.14B. GCWOF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGCWOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GCWOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCWOF is a better buy in the long-term than CX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а -7.13% price change this week, while GCWOF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.99% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($13.1B) has a higher market cap than GCWOF($3.19B). CX has higher P/E ratio than GCWOF: CX (73.74) vs GCWOF (12.33). GCWOF YTD gains are higher at: -13.566 vs. CX (-28.945). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.72B vs. GCWOF (288M). GCWOF has more cash in the bank: 770M vs. CX (533M). GCWOF has less debt than CX: GCWOF (516M) vs CX (9.16B). CX has higher revenues than GCWOF: CX (17B) vs GCWOF (1.25B).
CXGCWOFCX / GCWOF
Capitalization13.1B3.19B411%
EBITDA1.72B288M597%
Gain YTD-28.945-13.566213%
P/E Ratio73.7412.33598%
Revenue17B1.25B1,361%
Total Cash533M770M69%
Total Debt9.16B516M1,775%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs GCWOF: Fundamental Ratings
CX
GCWOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6941
SMR RATING
1..100
8236
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3791
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CX's Valuation (19) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCWOF (73) in the null industry. This means that CX’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CX (69) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GCWOF’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (82) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GCWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (81) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GCWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCWOF (91) in the null industry. This means that CX’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OM.X4.2332301.647470
+63.71%
MANTRA cryptocurrency
MLN.X15.931960-0.033752
-0.21%
Enzyme cryptocurrency
RGT.X0.231697-0.003470
-1.48%
Rari Governance Token cryptocurrency
CYBER.X3.597903-0.152279
-4.06%
Cyber cryptocurrency
ID.X0.432669-0.027459
-5.97%
SPACE ID cryptocurrency

GCWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCWOF and CX have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCWOF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCWOF
1D Price
Change %
GCWOF100%
N/A
CX - GCWOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
HCMLY - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
CTXXF - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
CMTOY - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
HLBZF - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More