CX
Price
$9.40
Change
+$0.17 (+1.84%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
13.64B
52 days until earnings call
GCWOF
Price
$9.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs GCWOF

Header iconCX vs GCWOF Comparison
Open Charts CX vs GCWOFBanner chart's image
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$9.40
Change+$0.17 (+1.84%)
Volume$11.45M
Capitalization13.64B
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua SAB de CV
Price$9.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.17K
Capitalization3.09B
CX vs GCWOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. GCWOF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a StrongBuy and GCWOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CX: $9.40 vs. GCWOF: $9.50)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. GCWOF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 92% vs. GCWOF: 113%
Market capitalization -- CX: $13.64B vs. GCWOF: $3.09B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $13.64B. GCWOF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGCWOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GCWOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CX and GCWOF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCWOF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GCWOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCWOF is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.41% price change this week, while GCWOF (@Construction Materials) price change was +4.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.34% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($13.6B) has a higher market cap than GCWOF($3.09B). CX has higher P/E ratio than GCWOF: CX (15.23) vs GCWOF (10.39). CX YTD gains are higher at: 67.781 vs. GCWOF (8.571). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. GCWOF (420M). CX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. GCWOF (827M). GCWOF has less debt than CX: GCWOF (628M) vs CX (7.36B). CX has higher revenues than GCWOF: CX (15.7B) vs GCWOF (1.34B).
CXGCWOFCX / GCWOF
Capitalization13.6B3.09B440%
EBITDA1.76B420M419%
Gain YTD67.7818.571791%
P/E Ratio15.2310.39147%
Revenue15.7B1.34B1,168%
Total Cash1.17B827M141%
Total Debt7.36B628M1,172%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs GCWOF: Fundamental Ratings
CX
GCWOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3049
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4243
SMR RATING
1..100
6353
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9726
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CX's Valuation (20) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCWOF (86) in the null industry. This means that CX’s stock grew significantly faster than GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as GCWOF (43) in the null industry. This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CX (63) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GCWOF’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as GCWOF (49) in the null industry. This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CX (97) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GCWOF’s stock grew significantly faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXGCWOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ION36.280.90
+2.55%
ProShares S&P Global Cor Btty Mtls ETF
KGRN28.760.58
+2.05%
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Tech ETF
YSPY19.840.08
+0.41%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF
HAWX36.630.06
+0.15%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI ACWI exUS ETF
SMIG29.820.01
+0.03%
Bahl & Gaynor Sm/Md Cp Inc Gr ETF

GCWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCWOF and CX have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCWOF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCWOF
1D Price
Change %
GCWOF100%
N/A
CX - GCWOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
HCMLY - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
CTXXF - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.30%
CMTOY - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
More