CX
Price
$9.00
Change
+$0.02 (+0.22%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
13.06B
29 days until earnings call
HCMLF
Price
$86.20
Change
+$0.03 (+0.03%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
46.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs HCMLF

Header iconCX vs HCMLF Comparison
Open Charts CX vs HCMLFBanner chart's image
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$9.00
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
Volume$4.51M
Capitalization13.06B
HOLCIM
Price$86.20
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
Volume$406
Capitalization46.36B
CX vs HCMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. HCMLF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Buy and HCMLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CX: $9.00 vs. HCMLF: $86.20)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. HCMLF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 38% vs. HCMLF: 30%
Market capitalization -- CX: $13.06B vs. HCMLF: $46.36B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $13.06B. HCMLF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $46.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLF is a better buy in the long-term than CX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HCMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLF is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а -0.77% price change this week, while HCMLF (@Construction Materials) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.60% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLF($46.4B) has a higher market cap than CX($13.1B). CX has higher P/E ratio than HCMLF: CX (14.85) vs HCMLF (12.06). HCMLF YTD gains are higher at: 71.058 vs. CX (61.019). HCMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.95B vs. CX (1.76B). HCMLF has more cash in the bank: 4.24B vs. CX (330M). HCMLF has higher revenues than CX: HCMLF (26.2B) vs CX (15.7B).
CXHCMLFCX / HCMLF
Capitalization13.1B46.4B28%
EBITDA1.76B6.95B25%
Gain YTD61.01971.05886%
P/E Ratio14.8512.06123%
Revenue15.7B26.2B60%
Total Cash330M4.24B8%
Total Debt7.36BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs HCMLF: Fundamental Ratings
CX
HCMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4338
SMR RATING
1..100
6345
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9876
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCMLF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CX (20) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CX (43) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CX (63) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CX (41) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLF's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CX (98) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXHCMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABIG31.400.23
+0.74%
Argent Large Cap ETF
SUSC23.510.03
+0.15%
iShares ESG USD Corporate Bond ETF
FCOR48.050.02
+0.03%
Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF
KPRO31.02N/A
N/A
KraneShares 100% KWEB Dfnd OutcmJan27ETF
KEMX34.36-0.04
-0.13%
KraneShares MSCI Em Mkts ex CHN ETF

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
+0.22%
CRH - CX
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
EXP - CX
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
VMC - CX
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
MLM - CX
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
KNF - CX
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
More

HCMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCMLF and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCMLF and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLF
1D Price
Change %
HCMLF100%
N/A
HCMLY - HCMLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
JHX - HCMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
HDLMY - HCMLF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
CRH - HCMLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
CX - HCMLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
More