CX
Price
$6.46
Change
+$0.04 (+0.62%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
13.14B
76 days until earnings call
SUM
Price
$52.49
Change
+$0.04 (+0.08%)
Updated
Feb 10 closing price
Capitalization
7.77B
Ad is loading...

CX vs SUM

Header iconCX vs SUM Comparison
Open Charts CX vs SUMBanner chart's image
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$6.46
Change+$0.04 (+0.62%)
Volume$18.32M
Capitalization13.14B
Summit Materials
Price$52.49
Change+$0.04 (+0.08%)
Volume$4.69M
Capitalization7.77B
CX vs SUM Comparison Chart
Loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. SUM commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Buy and SUM is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CX: $6.46 vs. SUM: $52.49)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. SUM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 119% vs. SUM: 100%
Market capitalization -- CX: $13.14B vs. SUM: $7.77B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $13.14B. SUM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $7.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSUM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SUM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CX is a better buy in the long-term than SUM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а +5.90% price change this week, while SUM (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

SUM is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.45% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($13.1B) has a higher market cap than SUM($7.77B). CX has higher P/E ratio than SUM: CX (73.74) vs SUM (18.04). CX YTD gains are higher at: 14.931 vs. SUM (3.735). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.72B vs. SUM (735M). CX has more cash in the bank: 533M vs. SUM (374M). SUM has less debt than CX: SUM (2.33B) vs CX (9.16B). CX has higher revenues than SUM: CX (17B) vs SUM (2.62B).
CXSUMCX / SUM
Capitalization13.1B7.77B169%
EBITDA1.72B735M234%
Gain YTD14.9313.735400%
P/E Ratio73.7418.04409%
Revenue17B2.62B649%
Total Cash533M374M143%
Total Debt9.16B2.33B392%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs SUM: Fundamental Ratings
CX
SUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4615
SMR RATING
1..100
6283
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
992
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CX's Valuation (17) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUM (88). This means that CX’s stock grew significantly faster than SUM’s over the last 12 months.

SUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (46). This means that SUM’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's SMR Rating (62) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SUM (83). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to SUM’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SUM (48). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to SUM’s over the last 12 months.

SUM's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for CX (99). This means that SUM’s stock grew significantly faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRU.X0.0423540.005318
+14.36%
TrueFi cryptocurrency
HNT.X3.9999060.355026
+9.74%
Helium cryptocurrency
WAVES.X1.1768220.084391
+7.73%
Waves cryptocurrency
GHTA29.380.44
+1.51%
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF
OPER100.180.01
+0.01%
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
+0.62%
EXP - CX
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.18%
MLM - CX
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
VMC - CX
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
CRH - CX
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
KNF - CX
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More