CX
Price
$11.82
Change
-$0.11 (-0.92%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
17.06B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MLM
Price
$525.14
Change
-$14.86 (-2.75%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
31.54B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs MLM

CX vs MLM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. MLM commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Hold and MLM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CX: $11.82 vs. MLM: $525.14)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. MLM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 70% vs. MLM: 165%
Market capitalization -- CX: $17.06B vs. MLM: $31.54B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $17.06B. MLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $31.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $63.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $12.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the long-term than CX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.99% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was -6.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

MLM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-2.76% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($31.5B) has a higher market cap than CX($17.1B). CX has higher P/E ratio than MLM: CX (36.87) vs MLM (34.14). CX YTD gains are higher at: 3.336 vs. MLM (-15.438). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.09B vs. CX (1.72B). CX has more cash in the bank: 654M vs. MLM (112M). MLM has less debt than CX: MLM (6.35B) vs CX (7.46B). CX has higher revenues than MLM: CX (17B) vs MLM (6.69B).
CXMLMCX / MLM
Capitalization17.1B31.5B54%
EBITDA1.72B2.09B83%
Gain YTD3.336-15.438-22%
P/E Ratio36.8734.14108%
Revenue17B6.69B254%
Total Cash654M112M584%
Total Debt7.46B6.35B118%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs MLM: Fundamental Ratings
CX
MLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9173
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6047
SMR RATING
1..100
8841
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
646
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CX's Valuation (48) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (78). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (60). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's SMR Rating (41) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (88). This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (63). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

CX's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLM (46). This means that CX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LOBO0.690.01
+1.47%
Lobo Technologies Ltd.
TBPH16.860.01
+0.06%
Theravance Biopharma
PHI19.69-0.03
-0.15%
PLDT
NTRA267.76-1.90
-0.70%
Natera
CRBP8.97-0.08
-0.88%
Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
-0.92%
CRH - CX
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
TTAM - CX
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
AMRZ - CX
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
MLM - CX
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
EXP - CX
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
More

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
-2.75%
VMC - MLM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
CRH - MLM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
EXP - MLM
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
TTAM - MLM
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
AMRZ - MLM
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
More