Advertisement
CXAI vs MLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXAI is a Hold and MLAC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CXAI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CXAI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MLAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CXAI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLAC’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CXAI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MLAC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CXAI (@Packaged Software) experienced а -17.15% price change this week, while MLAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.08%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.01%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-5.18% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.48% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| CXAI | MLAC | CXAI / MLAC | |
| Capitalization | 13.4M | 322M | 4% |
| EBITDA | -5.28M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -74.321 | N/A | - |
| P/E Ratio | 0.83 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.01M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 4.85M | 1.16M | 418% |
| Total Debt | 7.96M | N/A | - |
| CXAI | MLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 7 days ago 7% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 2% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 10% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 7% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 7% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 2% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 15 days ago 3% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
Advertisement
CXAI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXAI has been loosely correlated with PLMIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXAI jumps, then PLMIU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXAI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXAI | 100% | +1.80% | ||
| PLMIU - CXAI | 50% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SOC - CXAI | 40% Loosely correlated | +5.26% | ||
| AIFF - CXAI | 35% Loosely correlated | +9.40% | ||
| AUUD - CXAI | 31% Poorly correlated | -4.42% | ||
| AMST - CXAI | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
MLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLAC has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLAC jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLAC | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| BOWNU - MLAC | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CXAI - MLAC | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| ATMV - MLAC | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.48% | ||
| LNZA - MLAC | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
| SOC - MLAC | 21% Poorly correlated | +5.26% | ||
More | ||||