It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CXDO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLBTYK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CXDO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBTYK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CXDO (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -11.60% price change this week, while LBTYK (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +2.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.27%.
CXDO is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.
LBTYK is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CXDO | LBTYK | CXDO / LBTYK | |
| Capitalization | 185M | 3.72B | 5% |
| EBITDA | 6.62M | -521.6M | -1% |
| Gain YTD | 15.105 | -15.677 | -96% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.64 | 2.06 | 2,021% |
| Revenue | 64.5M | 4.77B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 23.4M | 1.67B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 1.62M | 9.23B | 0% |
CXDO | LBTYK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 19 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LBTYK's Valuation (70) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as CXDO (78) in the null industry. This means that LBTYK’s stock grew similarly to CXDO’s over the last 12 months.
LBTYK's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as CXDO (100) in the null industry. This means that LBTYK’s stock grew similarly to CXDO’s over the last 12 months.
CXDO's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as LBTYK (91) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that CXDO’s stock grew similarly to LBTYK’s over the last 12 months.
CXDO's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as LBTYK (60) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that CXDO’s stock grew similarly to LBTYK’s over the last 12 months.
LBTYK's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXDO (96) in the null industry. This means that LBTYK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXDO’s over the last 12 months.
| CXDO | LBTYK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 69% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXDO has been loosely correlated with LUMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXDO jumps, then LUMN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXDO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXDO | 100% | +3.26% | ||
| LUMN - CXDO | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| LILAK - CXDO | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.42% | ||
| LILA - CXDO | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.39% | ||
| LBTYK - CXDO | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.50% | ||
| TLK - CXDO | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYK has been closely correlated with LBTYA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBTYK jumps, then LBTYA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBTYK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBTYK | 100% | +2.50% | ||
| LBTYA - LBTYK | 96% Closely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| CABO - LBTYK | 49% Loosely correlated | +8.67% | ||
| S - LBTYK | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| TDS - LBTYK | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| LBTYB - LBTYK | 39% Loosely correlated | +4.47% | ||
More | ||||