Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CXHYX vs PTCCX
CXHYX vs PTCCX Comparison
Open Charts CXHYX vs PTCCX
Macquarie National Hi-Yld Muni Bd A
Price$9.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.36B
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield C
Price$11.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets608.79M
CXHYX vs PTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CXHYX vs. PTCCX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXHYX is a Hold and PTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXHYX has more cash in the bank: 3.36B vs. PTCCX (609M). CXHYX pays higher dividends than PTCCX: CXHYX (4.89) vs PTCCX (3.42). CXHYX was incepted earlier than PTCCX: CXHYX (39 years) vs PTCCX (27 years). PTCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CXHYX (0.87). PTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CXHYX (19.00). PTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CXHYX: PTCCX (0) vs CXHYX (1000). CXHYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.04 vs. PTCCX (-2.85). CXHYX return over 5 years is better than : 3.42 vs. PTCCX (-8.42).
| CXHYX | PTCCX | CXHYX / PTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.71 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.71 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.652 | -0.673 | 97% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.36B | 609M | 552% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 3.42 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.04 | -2.85 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.94 | 3.68 | 270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.42 | -8.42 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.56 | -3.55 | -749% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers