Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CXHYX vs PTFRX
CXHYX vs PTFRX Comparison
Open Charts CXHYX vs PTFRX
Macquarie National Hi-Yld Muni Bd A
Price$9.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.36B
Putnam Tax Free High Yield R6
Price$11.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets608.79M
CXHYX vs PTFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CXHYX vs. PTFRX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXHYX is a Hold and PTFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXHYX has more cash in the bank: 3.36B vs. PTFRX (609M). CXHYX pays higher dividends than PTFRX: CXHYX (4.89) vs PTFRX (4.47). CXHYX was incepted earlier than PTFRX: CXHYX (39 years) vs PTFRX (7 years). CXHYX (0.87) is less costly to investors than PTFRX (0.69). PTFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CXHYX (19.00). PTFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CXHYX: PTFRX (0) vs CXHYX (1000). CXHYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.04 vs. PTFRX (-2.59). CXHYX return over 5 years is better than : 3.42 vs. PTFRX (-8.01).
| CXHYX | PTFRX | CXHYX / PTFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.69 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.69 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.652 | -0.415 | 157% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.36B | 609M | 552% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 4.47 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.04 | -2.59 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.94 | 3.85 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.42 | -8.01 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement