CXMSF
Price
$0.90
Change
-$0.05 (-5.26%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.06B
SDCVF
Price
$63.03
Change
-$0.37 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.2B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXMSF vs SDCVF

Header iconCXMSF vs SDCVF Comparison
Open Charts CXMSF vs SDCVFBanner chart's image
Cemex S.A.B de C.V
Price$0.90
Change-$0.05 (-5.26%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization13.06B
Sa des Ciments Vicat
Price$63.03
Change-$0.37 (-0.58%)
Volume$174
Capitalization3.2B
CXMSF vs SDCVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SDCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXMSF vs. SDCVF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXMSF is a Hold and SDCVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CXMSF: $0.90 vs. SDCVF: $63.03)
Brand notoriety: CXMSF and SDCVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXMSF: 0% vs. SDCVF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CXMSF: $13.06B vs. SDCVF: $3.2B
CXMSF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $13.06B. SDCVF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSDCVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CXMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SDCVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SDCVF is a better buy in the long-term than CXMSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXMSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SDCVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SDCVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SDCVF is a better buy in the short-term than CXMSF.

Price Growth

CXMSF (@Construction Materials) experienced а -5.26% price change this week, while SDCVF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.39% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXMSF($13.1B) has a higher market cap than SDCVF($3.2B). CXMSF has higher P/E ratio than SDCVF: CXMSF (14.85) vs SDCVF (8.90). CXMSF YTD gains are higher at: 70.143 vs. SDCVF (63.332). CXMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. SDCVF (809M). SDCVF has more cash in the bank: 529M vs. CXMSF (330M). SDCVF has less debt than CXMSF: SDCVF (1.91B) vs CXMSF (7.36B). CXMSF has higher revenues than SDCVF: CXMSF (15.7B) vs SDCVF (3.83B).
CXMSFSDCVFCXMSF / SDCVF
Capitalization13.1B3.2B410%
EBITDA1.76B809M218%
Gain YTD70.14363.332111%
P/E Ratio14.858.90167%
Revenue15.7B3.83B410%
Total Cash330M529M62%
Total Debt7.36B1.91B385%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXMSF: Fundamental Ratings
CXMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMSFSDCVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SDCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBT17.190.04
+0.23%
ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury
DBJP86.100.13
+0.15%
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
EQRR63.41N/A
N/A
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
JLQD42.37N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
VAW200.26-2.00
-0.99%
Vanguard Materials ETF

CXMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXMSF and CX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXMSF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXMSF
1D Price
Change %
CXMSF100%
N/A
CX - CXMSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - CXMSF
17%
Poorly correlated
-4.20%
XYIGY - CXMSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
SDCVF - CXMSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRKWF - CXMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SDCVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SDCVF and CMTOY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SDCVF and CMTOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SDCVF
1D Price
Change %
SDCVF100%
N/A
CMTOY - SDCVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.67%
CXMSF - SDCVF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XYIGF - SDCVF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNF - SDCVF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
XYIGY - SDCVF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
More