CXMSF
Price
$0.70
Change
+$0.04 (+6.06%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.5B
SDCVF
Price
$63.03
Change
-$0.37 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXMSF vs SDCVF

Header iconCXMSF vs SDCVF Comparison
Open Charts CXMSF vs SDCVFBanner chart's image
Cemex S.A.B de C.V
Price$0.70
Change+$0.04 (+6.06%)
Volume$501.68K
Capitalization11.5B
Sa des Ciments Vicat
Price$63.03
Change-$0.37 (-0.58%)
Volume$174
Capitalization1.51B
CXMSF vs SDCVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SDCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXMSF vs. SDCVF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXMSF is a StrongBuy and SDCVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CXMSF: $0.70 vs. SDCVF: $63.03)
Brand notoriety: CXMSF and SDCVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXMSF: 81% vs. SDCVF: 31%
Market capitalization -- CXMSF: $11.5B vs. SDCVF: $1.51B
CXMSF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $11.5B. SDCVF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSDCVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CXMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SDCVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXMSF is a better buy in the long-term than SDCVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXMSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SDCVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXMSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SDCVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXMSF is a better buy in the short-term than SDCVF.

Price Growth

CXMSF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SDCVF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXMSF($11.5B) has a higher market cap than SDCVF($1.51B). CXMSF has higher P/E ratio than SDCVF: CXMSF (4.88) vs SDCVF (4.49). SDCVF YTD gains are higher at: 63.332 vs. CXMSF (31.995). CXMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.69B vs. SDCVF (646M). CXMSF (471M) and SDCVF (463M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SDCVF has less debt than CXMSF: SDCVF (2.09B) vs CXMSF (9.16B). CXMSF has higher revenues than SDCVF: CXMSF (16.4B) vs SDCVF (3.8B).
CXMSFSDCVFCXMSF / SDCVF
Capitalization11.5B1.51B761%
EBITDA1.69B646M261%
Gain YTD31.99563.33251%
P/E Ratio4.884.49109%
Revenue16.4B3.8B432%
Total Cash471M463M102%
Total Debt9.16B2.09B438%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXMSF: Fundamental Ratings
CXMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMSFSDCVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SDCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POGAX73.170.83
+1.15%
Putnam Large Cap Growth A
MMIEX15.830.13
+0.83%
MM S&P 500® Index Svc
IPMIX20.210.16
+0.80%
Voya Index Plus MidCap Port I
GOODX51.300.35
+0.69%
GoodHaven
PGJCX17.590.05
+0.29%
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure C

CXMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXMSF and CX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXMSF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXMSF
1D Price
Change %
CXMSF100%
N/A
CX - CXMSF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
WBRBY - CXMSF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
XYIGY - CXMSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDCVF - CXMSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRKWF - CXMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SDCVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SDCVF and CMTOY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SDCVF and CMTOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SDCVF
1D Price
Change %
SDCVF100%
N/A
CMTOY - SDCVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+8.95%
CXMSF - SDCVF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XYIGF - SDCVF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNF - SDCVF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
XYIGY - SDCVF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More