CXMSF
Price
$0.90
Change
-$0.05 (-5.26%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.06B
WBRBY
Price
$6.61
Change
-$0.29 (-4.20%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.66B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXMSF vs WBRBY

Header iconCXMSF vs WBRBY Comparison
Open Charts CXMSF vs WBRBYBanner chart's image
Cemex S.A.B de C.V
Price$0.90
Change-$0.05 (-5.26%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization13.06B
Wienerberger Baustoffindustrie AG
Price$6.61
Change-$0.29 (-4.20%)
Volume$16.13K
Capitalization3.66B
CXMSF vs WBRBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WBRBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXMSF vs. WBRBY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXMSF is a Hold and WBRBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CXMSF: $0.90 vs. WBRBY: $6.61)
Brand notoriety: CXMSF and WBRBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXMSF: 0% vs. WBRBY: 125%
Market capitalization -- CXMSF: $13.06B vs. WBRBY: $3.66B
CXMSF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $13.06B. WBRBY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWBRBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CXMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WBRBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXMSF is a better buy in the long-term than WBRBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXMSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WBRBY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WBRBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WBRBY is a better buy in the short-term than CXMSF.

Price Growth

CXMSF (@Construction Materials) experienced а -5.26% price change this week, while WBRBY (@Construction Materials) price change was -1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

WBRBY is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-1.39% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXMSF($13.1B) has a higher market cap than WBRBY($3.66B). WBRBY has higher P/E ratio than CXMSF: WBRBY (16.46) vs CXMSF (14.85). CXMSF YTD gains are higher at: 70.143 vs. WBRBY (28.750). CXMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. WBRBY (750M). CXMSF has more cash in the bank: 330M vs. WBRBY (232M). CXMSF has higher revenues than WBRBY: CXMSF (15.7B) vs WBRBY (4.65B).
CXMSFWBRBYCXMSF / WBRBY
Capitalization13.1B3.66B358%
EBITDA1.76B750M235%
Gain YTD70.14328.750244%
P/E Ratio14.8516.4690%
Revenue15.7B4.65B338%
Total Cash330M232M142%
Total Debt7.36BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXMSF vs WBRBY: Fundamental Ratings
CXMSF
WBRBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4365
SMR RATING
1..100
6379
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9890
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WBRBY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CXMSF (19). This means that WBRBY’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as WBRBY (65). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew similarly to WBRBY’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as WBRBY (79). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew similarly to WBRBY’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as WBRBY (61). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew similarly to WBRBY’s over the last 12 months.

WBRBY's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CXMSF (98). This means that WBRBY’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMSFWBRBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WBRBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VWUSX82.48N/A
N/A
Vanguard US Growth Investor
PLBBX39.99N/A
N/A
Plumb Balanced Investor
RSESX18.37N/A
N/A
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity S
MAISX22.53N/A
N/A
Victory Integrity Small/Mid-Cap Value A
IAAEX11.51N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps I2

CXMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXMSF and CX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXMSF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXMSF
1D Price
Change %
CXMSF100%
N/A
CX - CXMSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - CXMSF
17%
Poorly correlated
-4.20%
XYIGY - CXMSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
SDCVF - CXMSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRKWF - CXMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WBRBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WBRBY and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WBRBY and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBRBY
1D Price
Change %
WBRBY100%
-4.20%
HCMLY - WBRBY
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
HDLMY - WBRBY
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.03%
CXMSF - WBRBY
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XYIGY - WBRBY
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
XYIGF - WBRBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More