CXOXF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
168.47M
DAUGF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
12.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXOXF vs DAUGF

Header iconCXOXF vs DAUGF Comparison
Open Charts CXOXF vs DAUGFBanner chart's image
Core Lithium
Price$0.07
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization168.47M
Desert Gold Ventures
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.2K
Capitalization12.79M
CXOXF vs DAUGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXOXF vs. DAUGF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXOXF is a Hold and DAUGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CXOXF: $0.06 vs. DAUGF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: CXOXF and DAUGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXOXF: 30% vs. DAUGF: 106%
Market capitalization -- CXOXF: $168.47M vs. DAUGF: $12.79M
CXOXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $168.47M. DAUGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $12.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXOXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDAUGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXOXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DAUGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXOXF is a better buy in the long-term than DAUGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXOXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DAUGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXOXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • DAUGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DAUGF is a better buy in the short-term than CXOXF.

Price Growth

CXOXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.62% price change this week, while DAUGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -21.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXOXF($168M) has a higher market cap than DAUGF($12.8M). DAUGF YTD gains are higher at: 39.466 vs. CXOXF (34.021). DAUGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.37M vs. CXOXF (-47.88M).
CXOXFDAUGFCXOXF / DAUGF
Capitalization168M12.8M1,313%
EBITDA-47.88M-2.37M2,021%
Gain YTD34.02139.46686%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A358K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXOXF vs DAUGF: Fundamental Ratings
CXOXF
DAUGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4864
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CXOXF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAUGF (81). This means that CXOXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

CXOXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (100). This means that CXOXF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

CXOXF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (100). This means that CXOXF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

CXOXF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (64). This means that CXOXF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

CXOXF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (100). This means that CXOXF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXOXFDAUGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIIOX31.120.03
+0.10%
Marsico International Opportunities Inst
JSVAX29.58-0.03
-0.10%
Janus Henderson Contrarian T
JPDVX16.78-0.03
-0.18%
JPMorgan Diversified L
FUGIX49.34-0.17
-0.34%
Fidelity Advisor Utilities I
GQSCX13.97-0.05
-0.36%
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf

CXOXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXOXF and OMZNF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXOXF and OMZNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXOXF
1D Price
Change %
CXOXF100%
N/A
OMZNF - CXOXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
DAUGF - CXOXF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBLVF - CXOXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+9.18%
CVVUF - CXOXF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
CTXDF - CXOXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DAUGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DAUGF and LRAXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAUGF and LRAXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAUGF
1D Price
Change %
DAUGF100%
N/A
LRAXF - DAUGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
JZRIF - DAUGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRBF - DAUGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTCDF - DAUGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEODF - DAUGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More