CXOXF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
816.95M
DAUGF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
8.85M
Ad is loading...

CXOXF vs DAUGF

Header iconCXOXF vs DAUGF Comparison
Open Charts CXOXF vs DAUGFBanner chart's image
Core Lithium
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.45K
Capitalization816.95M
Desert Gold Ventures
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.85M
CXOXF vs DAUGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXOXF vs. DAUGF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXOXF is a Hold and DAUGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CXOXF: $0.06 vs. DAUGF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: CXOXF and DAUGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXOXF: 10% vs. DAUGF: 2%
Market capitalization -- CXOXF: $816.95M vs. DAUGF: $8.85M
CXOXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $816.95M. DAUGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $8.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXOXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDAUGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXOXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DAUGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXOXF is a better buy in the long-term than DAUGF.

Price Growth

CXOXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.14% price change this week, while DAUGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+0.03% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXOXF($817M) has a higher market cap than DAUGF($8.85M). CXOXF YTD gains are higher at: 22.887 vs. DAUGF (11.276). DAUGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.43M vs. CXOXF (-14.01M). CXOXF has more cash in the bank: 8.72M vs. DAUGF (853K). CXOXF has less debt than DAUGF: CXOXF (120K) vs DAUGF (146K).
CXOXFDAUGFCXOXF / DAUGF
Capitalization817M8.85M9,234%
EBITDA-14.01M-2.43M576%
Gain YTD22.88711.276203%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash8.72M853K1,022%
Total Debt120K146K82%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAUGF: Fundamental Ratings
DAUGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GVEZX19.49-0.22
-1.12%
GuideStone Funds Value Equity Investor
MMNBX10.02-0.13
-1.28%
MassMutual Diversified Value Y
OIRDX26.51-0.42
-1.56%
Invesco Rising Dividends R6
TCEPX41.82-0.80
-1.88%
Nuveen Equity Index Premier
SBASX12.49-0.32
-2.50%
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins

CXOXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXOXF and OMZNF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXOXF and OMZNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXOXF
1D Price
Change %
CXOXF100%
+6.43%
OMZNF - CXOXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
DAUGF - CXOXF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBLVF - CXOXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
CVVUF - CXOXF
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.11%
CTXDF - CXOXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DAUGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DAUGF and LRAXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAUGF and LRAXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAUGF
1D Price
Change %
DAUGF100%
N/A
LRAXF - DAUGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
JZRIF - DAUGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GUELF - DAUGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRBF - DAUGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTCDF - DAUGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More