CXOXF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
816.95M
DBLVF
Price
$0.54
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
54.77M
Ad is loading...

CXOXF vs DBLVF

Header iconCXOXF vs DBLVF Comparison
Open Charts CXOXF vs DBLVFBanner chart's image
Core Lithium
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20.5K
Capitalization816.95M
Doubleview Gold
Price$0.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$40.79K
Capitalization54.77M
CXOXF vs DBLVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXOXF vs. DBLVF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXOXF is a Hold and DBLVF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CXOXF: $0.05 vs. DBLVF: $0.54)
Brand notoriety: CXOXF and DBLVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXOXF: 101% vs. DBLVF: 44%
Market capitalization -- CXOXF: $816.95M vs. DBLVF: $54.77M
CXOXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $816.95M. DBLVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $54.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXOXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDBLVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXOXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DBLVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBLVF is a better buy in the long-term than CXOXF.

Price Growth

CXOXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -21.47% price change this week, while DBLVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.65% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXOXF($817M) has a higher market cap than DBLVF($54.8M). DBLVF YTD gains are higher at: 111.595 vs. CXOXF (-7.216). DBLVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.7M vs. CXOXF (-14.01M). CXOXF has more cash in the bank: 8.72M vs. DBLVF (2.26M). CXOXF has less debt than DBLVF: CXOXF (120K) vs DBLVF (626K).
CXOXFDBLVFCXOXF / DBLVF
Capitalization817M54.8M1,491%
EBITDA-14.01M-1.7M823%
Gain YTD-7.216111.595-6%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash8.72M2.26M386%
Total Debt120K626K19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXOXF vs DBLVF: Fundamental Ratings
CXOXF
DBLVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7480
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9856
SMR RATING
1..100
9592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CXOXF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as DBLVF (60). This means that CXOXF’s stock grew similarly to DBLVF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXOXF (98). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXOXF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CXOXF (95). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to CXOXF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CXOXF (63). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to CXOXF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CXOXF (100). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to CXOXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GPK26.15-0.15
-0.57%
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
FITBI25.06-0.18
-0.71%
Fifth Third Bancorp
SID1.58-0.02
-1.25%
Companhia Siderurgica Nacional SA
XBIT2.95-0.19
-6.05%
XBiotech
FMNB12.22-0.90
-6.86%
Farmers National Banc Corp

CXOXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXOXF and OMZNF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXOXF and OMZNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXOXF
1D Price
Change %
CXOXF100%
-8.54%
OMZNF - CXOXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
DAUGF - CXOXF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBLVF - CXOXF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
CVVUF - CXOXF
3%
Poorly correlated
-8.33%
CTXDF - CXOXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DBLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBLVF and UUSAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBLVF and UUSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBLVF
1D Price
Change %
DBLVF100%
+0.74%
UUSAF - DBLVF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
PBMLF - DBLVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+38.97%
CXOXF - DBLVF
9%
Poorly correlated
-8.54%
DECXF - DBLVF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
DCNNF - DBLVF
1%
Poorly correlated
-14.24%
More