CXW
Price
$21.67
Change
+$0.63 (+2.99%)
Updated
Jul 3, 01:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.75B
34 days until earnings call
SOHO
Price
$0.93
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
28.78M
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXW vs SOHO

Header iconCXW vs SOHO Comparison
Open Charts CXW vs SOHOBanner chart's image
CoreCivic
Price$21.67
Change+$0.63 (+2.99%)
Volume$2.71K
Capitalization1.75B
Sotherly Hotels
Price$0.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$267
Capitalization28.78M
CXW vs SOHO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CXW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOHO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXW vs. SOHO commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXW is a Hold and SOHO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CXW: $21.04 vs. SOHO: $0.93)
Brand notoriety: CXW and SOHO are both not notable
CXW represents the Miscellaneous Commercial Services, while SOHO is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXW: 88% vs. SOHO: 68%
Market capitalization -- CXW: $1.75B vs. SOHO: $28.78M
CXW [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $1.75B. SOHO’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $28.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.62B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSOHO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CXW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SOHO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOHO is a better buy in the long-term than CXW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOHO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SOHO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXW is a better buy in the short-term than SOHO.

Price Growth

CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +4.68% price change this week, while SOHO (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -11.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.36%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXW is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

SOHO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+1.53% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.15% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXW($1.75B) has a higher market cap than SOHO($28.8M). CXW has higher P/E ratio than SOHO: CXW (26.34) vs SOHO (17.75). SOHO YTD gains are higher at: -0.150 vs. CXW (-0.276). CXW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. SOHO (39.9M). CXW has more cash in the bank: 122M vs. SOHO (17.1M). SOHO has less debt than CXW: SOHO (318M) vs CXW (1.21B). CXW has higher revenues than SOHO: CXW (1.9B) vs SOHO (174M).
CXWSOHOCXW / SOHO
Capitalization1.75B28.8M6,076%
EBITDA296M39.9M742%
Gain YTD-0.276-0.150184%
P/E Ratio26.3417.75148%
Revenue1.9B174M1,090%
Total Cash122M17.1M713%
Total Debt1.21B318M380%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXW vs SOHO: Fundamental Ratings
CXW
SOHO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6780
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45100
SMR RATING
1..100
8192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
402
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOHO's Valuation (1) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for CXW (99). This means that SOHO’s stock grew significantly faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOHO (100). This means that CXW’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOHO’s over the last 12 months.

CXW's SMR Rating (81) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SOHO (92). This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to SOHO’s over the last 12 months.

SOHO's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CXW (51). This means that SOHO’s stock grew similarly to CXW’s over the last 12 months.

SOHO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXW (40). This means that SOHO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXWSOHO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOHO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGY23.360.55
+2.41%
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp
ALGT59.070.70
+1.20%
Allegiant Travel Company
NSC262.00-0.38
-0.14%
Norfolk Southern Corp
DAIO3.01-0.04
-1.31%
Data I/O Corp
XTKG1.55-0.03
-1.74%
X3 Holdings Co Ltd

CXW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXW
1D Price
Change %
CXW100%
+3.04%
GEO - CXW
77%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
RPT - CXW
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
ALEX - CXW
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
LOPE - CXW
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
KIM - CXW
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
More

SOHO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOHO has been loosely correlated with DBRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOHO jumps, then DBRG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOHO
1D Price
Change %
SOHO100%
-2.11%
DBRG - SOHO
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
NXRT - SOHO
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
AI - SOHO
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.09%
CXW - SOHO
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
CUBE - SOHO
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More