CXXIF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
DBCCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CXXIF vs DBCCF

Header iconCXXIF vs DBCCF Comparison
Open Charts CXXIF vs DBCCFBanner chart's image
C21 Investments
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$72.89K
CapitalizationN/A
Decibel Cannabis
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$17.68K
CapitalizationN/A
CXXIF vs DBCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CXXIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXXIF vs. DBCCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXXIF is a Hold and DBCCF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CXXIF: $0.19 vs. DBCCF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: CXXIF and DBCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXXIF: 90% vs. DBCCF: 54%
Market capitalization -- CXXIF: $36.23M vs. DBCCF: $42.97M
CXXIF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $36.23M. DBCCF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $42.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXXIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDBCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CXXIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DBCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CXXIF and DBCCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXXIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBCCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXXIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DBCCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBCCF is a better buy in the short-term than CXXIF.

Price Growth

CXXIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -8.63% price change this week, while DBCCF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -9.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.61% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DBCCF($43M) has a higher market cap than CXXIF($36.2M). DBCCF has higher P/E ratio than CXXIF: DBCCF (37.45) vs CXXIF (28.99). CXXIF YTD gains are higher at: -26.260 vs. DBCCF (-53.097). DBCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.05M vs. CXXIF (5.53M). DBCCF has more cash in the bank: 3.87M vs. CXXIF (1.83M). CXXIF has less debt than DBCCF: CXXIF (11M) vs DBCCF (49.3M). DBCCF has higher revenues than CXXIF: DBCCF (89.8M) vs CXXIF (29.1M).
CXXIFDBCCFCXXIF / DBCCF
Capitalization36.2M43M84%
EBITDA5.53M6.05M91%
Gain YTD-26.260-53.09749%
P/E Ratio28.9937.4577%
Revenue29.1M89.8M32%
Total Cash1.83M3.87M47%
Total Debt11M49.3M22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXXIF vs DBCCF: Fundamental Ratings
CXXIF
DBCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
36
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8375
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
618
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBCCF's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CXXIF (92). This means that DBCCF’s stock grew similarly to CXXIF’s over the last 12 months.

DBCCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CXXIF (100). This means that DBCCF’s stock grew similarly to CXXIF’s over the last 12 months.

DBCCF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CXXIF (89). This means that DBCCF’s stock grew similarly to CXXIF’s over the last 12 months.

DBCCF's Price Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CXXIF (83). This means that DBCCF’s stock grew similarly to CXXIF’s over the last 12 months.

CXXIF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as DBCCF (18). This means that CXXIF’s stock grew similarly to DBCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXXIFDBCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CXXIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERJ37.080.67
+1.84%
Embraer SA
SONY21.730.24
+1.12%
Sony Group Corporation
OXM85.34-1.06
-1.23%
Oxford Industries
FURY0.39-0.01
-2.01%
Fury Gold Mines Limited
MCB62.88-3.03
-4.60%
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp

CXXIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXXIF has been loosely correlated with GTBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXXIF jumps, then GTBIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXXIF
1D Price
Change %
CXXIF100%
+0.16%
GTBIF - CXXIF
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.23%
TCNNF - CXXIF
53%
Loosely correlated
+7.34%
VRNOF - CXXIF
52%
Loosely correlated
+6.56%
TSNDF - CXXIF
52%
Loosely correlated
+24.34%
AYRWF - CXXIF
49%
Loosely correlated
+17.72%
More

DBCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBCCF and AYTU have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBCCF and AYTU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBCCF
1D Price
Change %
DBCCF100%
-7.73%
AYTU - DBCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
ESALF - DBCCF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBHPF - DBCCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+25.00%
CXXIF - DBCCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
CRLBF - DBCCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
More