Ad is loading...
CXXIF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
ETST
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.02 (+16.67%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CXXIF vs ETST

Header iconCXXIF vs ETST Comparison
Open Charts CXXIF vs ETSTBanner chart's image
C21 Investments
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$32.23K
CapitalizationN/A
Earth Science Tech
Price$0.14
Change+$0.02 (+16.67%)
Volume$86.81K
CapitalizationN/A
CXXIF vs ETST Comparison Chart
Loading...
ETST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXXIF vs. ETST commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXXIF is a Hold and ETST is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CXXIF: $0.21 vs. ETST: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CXXIF and ETST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXXIF: 24% vs. ETST: 95%
Market capitalization -- CXXIF: $36.23M vs. ETST: $23.62M
CXXIF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $36.23M. ETST’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $23.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXXIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileETST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CXXIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ETST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ETST is a better buy in the long-term than CXXIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ETST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ETST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CXXIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +26.17% price change this week, while ETST (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -5.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

ETST is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-5.07% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXXIF($36.2M) has a higher market cap than ETST($23.6M). CXXIF has higher P/E ratio than ETST: CXXIF (28.99) vs ETST (0.68). ETST YTD gains are higher at: 98.278 vs. CXXIF (-17.717). CXXIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.53M vs. ETST (-167.31K). CXXIF has more cash in the bank: 1.83M vs. ETST (92K). ETST has less debt than CXXIF: ETST (633K) vs CXXIF (11M). CXXIF has higher revenues than ETST: CXXIF (29.1M) vs ETST (268K).
CXXIFETSTCXXIF / ETST
Capitalization36.2M23.6M153%
EBITDA5.53M-167.31K-3,307%
Gain YTD-17.71798.278-18%
P/E Ratio28.990.684,277%
Revenue29.1M268K10,858%
Total Cash1.83M92K1,987%
Total Debt11M633K1,738%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CXXIF vs ETST: Fundamental Ratings
CXXIF
ETST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8715
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
799
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ETST's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CXXIF (100). This means that ETST’s stock grew similarly to CXXIF’s over the last 12 months.

ETST's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CXXIF (100). This means that ETST’s stock grew similarly to CXXIF’s over the last 12 months.

ETST's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CXXIF (87). This means that ETST’s stock grew significantly faster than CXXIF’s over the last 12 months.

ETST's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CXXIF (85). This means that ETST’s stock grew similarly to CXXIF’s over the last 12 months.

CXXIF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ETST (99). This means that CXXIF’s stock grew significantly faster than ETST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETST
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ETST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLL18.400.06
+0.33%
ProShares UltraShort Gold
GOAU19.79-0.07
-0.35%
US Global GO GOLD and Prec Mtl Mnrs ETF
SDOG59.01-0.30
-0.51%
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
RSPS30.68-0.38
-1.22%
Invesco S&P 500® Eql Wt Cnsm Stapl ETF
VGT602.95-15.03
-2.43%
Vanguard Information Technology ETF

CXXIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXXIF has been loosely correlated with GTBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXXIF jumps, then GTBIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXXIF
1D Price
Change %
CXXIF100%
+1.11%
GTBIF - CXXIF
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
TCNNF - CXXIF
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.50%
VRNOF - CXXIF
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.93%
TSNDF - CXXIF
52%
Loosely correlated
+4.59%
AYRWF - CXXIF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
More

ETST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ETST and RSCI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ETST and RSCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ETST
1D Price
Change %
ETST100%
+15.17%
RSCI - ETST
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.83%
CXXIF - ETST
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
ESALF - ETST
14%
Poorly correlated
-6.56%
HLTRF - ETST
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKMPY - ETST
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
More