CYBQF
Price
$1.07
Change
-$0.05 (-4.46%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
258.24M
CZMWF
Price
$54.14
Change
+$4.53 (+9.13%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYBQF vs CZMWF

Header iconCYBQF vs CZMWF Comparison
Open Charts CYBQF vs CZMWFBanner chart's image
Cyberdyne
Price$1.07
Change-$0.05 (-4.46%)
Volume$100
Capitalization258.24M
Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
Price$54.14
Change+$4.53 (+9.13%)
Volume$40
Capitalization4.64B
CYBQF vs CZMWF Comparison Chart in %
CYBQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZMWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYBQF vs. CZMWF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYBQF is a Hold and CZMWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CYBQF: $1.07 vs. CZMWF: $54.14)
Brand notoriety: CYBQF and CZMWF are both not notable
CYBQF represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while CZMWF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYBQF: 67% vs. CZMWF: 42%
Market capitalization -- CYBQF: $258.24M vs. CZMWF: $4.64B
CYBQF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $258.24M. CZMWF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $4.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $234.25B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $162.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.58B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $11.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYBQF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCZMWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CYBQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CZMWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CZMWF is a better buy in the long-term than CYBQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYBQF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CZMWF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYBQF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CZMWF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZMWF is a better buy in the short-term than CYBQF.

Price Growth

CYBQF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -17.69% price change this week, while CZMWF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +8.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +3.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.39%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+3.44% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+4.21% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CZMWF($4.64B) has a higher market cap than CYBQF($258M). CZMWF YTD gains are higher at: 12.557 vs. CYBQF (3.382). CZMWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 226M vs. CYBQF (73M). CYBQF has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. CZMWF (51.5M). CZMWF has less debt than CYBQF: CZMWF (147M) vs CYBQF (536M). CYBQF has higher revenues than CZMWF: CYBQF (4.39B) vs CZMWF (2.18B).
CYBQFCZMWFCYBQF / CZMWF
Capitalization258M4.64B6%
EBITDA73M226M32%
Gain YTD3.38212.55727%
P/E RatioN/A24.72-
Revenue4.39B2.18B202%
Total Cash15.6B51.5M30,291%
Total Debt536M147M365%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYBQF vs CZMWF: Fundamental Ratings
CYBQF
CZMWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9578
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8763
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10056
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5548

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZMWF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYBQF (99). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew significantly faster than CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.

CZMWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQF (100). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew similarly to CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.

CZMWF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQF (95). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew similarly to CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.

CZMWF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQF (87). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew similarly to CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.

CZMWF's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYBQF (100). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYBQFCZMWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYBQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZMWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGMNX29.090.17
+0.59%
Janus Henderson Triton N
MPLAX16.040.09
+0.56%
Praxis International Index A
CMIRX9.680.05
+0.52%
Conestoga Discovery Institutional
CSMDX15.750.06
+0.38%
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth I
FIIMX25.240.04
+0.16%
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II I

CYBQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYBQF has been loosely correlated with IMTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYBQF jumps, then IMTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYBQF
1D Price
Change %
CYBQF100%
-4.46%
IMTH - CYBQF
41%
Loosely correlated
-14.29%
CNVVF - CYBQF
8%
Poorly correlated
+8.45%
CZMWY - CYBQF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.21%
CYBQY - CYBQF
2%
Poorly correlated
+15.88%
CZMWF - CYBQF
1%
Poorly correlated
+9.13%
More

CZMWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CZMWF and CZMWY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZMWF and CZMWY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZMWF
1D Price
Change %
CZMWF100%
+9.13%
CZMWY - CZMWF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.21%
SMMNY - CZMWF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.32%
FONR - CZMWF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
CLPBY - CZMWF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
CLPBF - CZMWF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More