It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYBR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOKTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYBR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OKTA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CYBR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.79% price change this week, while OKTA (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.59%.
CYBR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
OKTA is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CYBR | OKTA | CYBR / OKTA | |
Capitalization | 11.2B | 17.3B | 65% |
EBITDA | -41.01M | -245M | 17% |
Gain YTD | -2.194 | 24.277 | -9% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 752M | 2.26B | 33% |
Total Cash | 993M | 2.2B | 45% |
Total Debt | 581M | 1.3B | 45% |
CYBR | OKTA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CYBR's Valuation (98) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as OKTA (98). This means that CYBR’s stock grew similarly to OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for OKTA (100). This means that CYBR’s stock grew significantly faster than OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
OKTA's SMR Rating (90) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CYBR (91). This means that OKTA’s stock grew similarly to CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
OKTA's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CYBR (47). This means that OKTA’s stock grew similarly to CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OKTA (56). This means that CYBR’s stock grew somewhat faster than OKTA’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR | OKTA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago81% | 10 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago82% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
KJUL | 26.98 | 0.20 | +0.75% |
Innovator Russell 2000 Pwr Bffr ETF™ Jul | |||
EFT | 11.75 | 0.08 | +0.69% |
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | |||
PDP | 95.88 | 0.57 | +0.60% |
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | |||
VV | 242.47 | 0.61 | +0.25% |
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | |||
PUTD | 18.54 | N/A | N/A |
Cboe(R) Validus S&P 500(R) Dyn PtwIdxETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYBR has been loosely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYBR jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CYBR | 100% | -1.65% | ||
PANW - CYBR | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
CRWD - CYBR | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
DSGX - CYBR | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
COIN - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
NOW - CYBR | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.08% | ||
More |