It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYBR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePRTH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYBR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRTH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CYBR (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.22% price change this week, while PRTH (@Packaged Software) price change was +21.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +6.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.88%.
CYBR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
PRTH is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CYBR | PRTH | CYBR / PRTH | |
Capitalization | 11.2B | 244M | 4,590% |
EBITDA | -41.01M | 152M | -27% |
Gain YTD | 8.447 | -36.511 | -23% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 32.36 | - |
Revenue | 752M | 756M | 99% |
Total Cash | 993M | 39.6M | 2,508% |
Total Debt | 581M | 639M | 91% |
CYBR | PRTH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 21 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRTH's Valuation (53) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYBR (98) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PRTH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PRTH (42) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CYBR’s stock grew similarly to PRTH’s over the last 12 months.
PRTH's SMR Rating (90) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CYBR (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PRTH’s stock grew similarly to CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PRTH (44) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CYBR’s stock grew similarly to PRTH’s over the last 12 months.
PRTH's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CYBR (22) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PRTH’s stock grew similarly to CYBR’s over the last 12 months.
CYBR | PRTH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 1 day ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 1 day ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 1 day ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 1 day ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 1 day ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago81% | 2 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago70% | 8 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 1 day ago80% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
QQQM | 212.27 | 3.20 | +1.53% |
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | |||
QQQE | 94.27 | 0.85 | +0.91% |
Direxion NASDAQ-100® Equal Wtd ETF | |||
BKMC | 100.47 | 0.73 | +0.73% |
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | |||
XTWO | 49.21 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
BondBloxx Bloomberg Two YrTrgDurUSTrsETF | |||
NUSA | 23.14 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year US Aggt Bd ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYBR has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CYBR jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CYBR | 100% | -1.73% | ||
PANW - CYBR | 68% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
CRWD - CYBR | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.51% | ||
DSGX - CYBR | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
COIN - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | +23.97% | ||
ADSK - CYBR | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
More |