CYBR
Price
$474.69
Change
-$1.26 (-0.26%)
Updated
Sep 16, 12:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.99B
44 days until earnings call
QLYS
Price
$132.08
Change
-$1.38 (-1.03%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.77B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYBR vs QLYS

Header iconCYBR vs QLYS Comparison
Open Charts CYBR vs QLYSBanner chart's image
CyberArk Software
Price$474.69
Change-$1.26 (-0.26%)
Volume$1.26K
Capitalization23.99B
Qualys
Price$132.08
Change-$1.38 (-1.03%)
Volume$385.86K
Capitalization4.77B
CYBR vs QLYS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QLYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYBR vs. QLYS commentary
Sep 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYBR is a Buy and QLYS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CYBR: $475.95 vs. QLYS: $132.08)
Brand notoriety: CYBR: Notable vs. QLYS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYBR: 83% vs. QLYS: 120%
Market capitalization -- CYBR: $23.99B vs. QLYS: $4.77B
CYBR [@Computer Communications] is valued at $23.99B. QLYS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $4.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.83T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYBR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQLYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CYBR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QLYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYBR is a better buy in the long-term than QLYS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYBR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QLYS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QLYS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CYBR is a better buy in the short-term than QLYS.

Price Growth

CYBR (@Computer Communications) experienced а +1.53% price change this week, while QLYS (@Computer Communications) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +3.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +71.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CYBR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

QLYS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+3.33% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYBR($24B) has a higher market cap than QLYS($4.77B). CYBR has higher P/E ratio than QLYS: CYBR (1272.70) vs QLYS (26.31). CYBR YTD gains are higher at: 42.864 vs. QLYS (-5.805). QLYS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 214M vs. CYBR (58.8M). CYBR has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. QLYS (370M). QLYS has less debt than CYBR: QLYS (55.3M) vs CYBR (1.22B). CYBR has higher revenues than QLYS: CYBR (1.2B) vs QLYS (637M).
CYBRQLYSCYBR / QLYS
Capitalization24B4.77B503%
EBITDA58.8M214M27%
Gain YTD42.864-5.805-738%
P/E Ratio1272.7026.314,837%
Revenue1.2B637M188%
Total Cash1.54B370M416%
Total Debt1.22B55.3M2,204%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYBR vs QLYS: Fundamental Ratings
CYBR
QLYS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
247
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
778
SMR RATING
1..100
9524
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2355
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QLYS's Valuation (80) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CYBR (99). This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to CYBR’s over the last 12 months.

CYBR's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for QLYS (78). This means that CYBR’s stock grew significantly faster than QLYS’s over the last 12 months.

QLYS's SMR Rating (24) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYBR (95). This means that QLYS’s stock grew significantly faster than CYBR’s over the last 12 months.

CYBR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QLYS (57). This means that CYBR’s stock grew similarly to QLYS’s over the last 12 months.

CYBR's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QLYS (55). This means that CYBR’s stock grew similarly to QLYS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYBRQLYS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QLYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEGRX181.08N/A
N/A
MFS Growth R2
LBWIX22.40N/A
N/A
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
SPMHX8.55N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha R5
VIOPX17.47N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I International Opps
GQRRX18.84N/A
N/A
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity R6

CYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYBR has been loosely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYBR
1D Price
Change %
CYBR100%
+2.07%
CRWD - CYBR
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
COIN - CYBR
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
PANW - CYBR
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
ZS - CYBR
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
CVLT - CYBR
57%
Loosely correlated
+7.72%
More

QLYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with TENB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then TENB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLYS
1D Price
Change %
QLYS100%
-1.03%
TENB - QLYS
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
CCSI - QLYS
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
DJCO - QLYS
54%
Loosely correlated
+9.35%
PCTY - QLYS
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
ADSK - QLYS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
More