CYFWF
Price
$2.64
Change
+$0.25 (+10.46%)
Updated
Mar 20 closing price
OAMCF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.02 (-11.76%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Ad is loading...

CYFWF vs OAMCF

Header iconCYFWF vs OAMCF Comparison
Open Charts CYFWF vs OAMCFBanner chart's image
Cyfrowy Polsat S.A
Price$2.64
Change+$0.25 (+10.46%)
Volume$945
CapitalizationN/A
Overactive Media
Price$0.15
Change-$0.02 (-11.76%)
Volume$3K
CapitalizationN/A
CYFWF vs OAMCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
OAMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYFWF vs. OAMCF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYFWF is a Hold and OAMCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CYFWF: $2.64 vs. OAMCF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: CYFWF and OAMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Movies/Entertainment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYFWF: 100% vs. OAMCF: 63%
Market capitalization -- CYFWF: $2.22B vs. OAMCF: $10M
CYFWF [@Movies/Entertainment] is valued at $2.22B. OAMCF’s [@Movies/Entertainment] market capitalization is $10M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry ranges from $262.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry is $9.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYFWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOAMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CYFWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OAMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OAMCF is a better buy in the long-term than CYFWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OAMCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OAMCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CYFWF (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OAMCF (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was -26.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Movies/Entertainment (-0.51% weekly)

Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYFWF($2.22B) has a higher market cap than OAMCF($10M). OAMCF YTD gains are higher at: 53.500 vs. CYFWF (-17.877). CYFWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.36B vs. OAMCF (-3.37M). CYFWF has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. OAMCF (10.4M). OAMCF has less debt than CYFWF: OAMCF (1.87M) vs CYFWF (12.6B). CYFWF has higher revenues than OAMCF: CYFWF (13.1B) vs OAMCF (13.7M).
CYFWFOAMCFCYFWF / OAMCF
Capitalization2.22B10M22,214%
EBITDA4.36B-3.37M-129,581%
Gain YTD-17.87753.500-33%
P/E Ratio5.77N/A-
Revenue13.1B13.7M95,620%
Total Cash1.46B10.4M14,077%
Total Debt12.6B1.87M675,241%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYFWFOAMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
OAMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDVWX7.530.09
+1.21%
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value W
SDLAX18.560.21
+1.14%
SEI Dynamic Asset Allocation A (SIIT)
MITDX36.790.40
+1.10%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr R4
CADVX19.600.19
+0.98%
Calamos Dividend Growth A
GLVAX78.930.48
+0.61%
Invesco Global Focus A

CYFWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYFWF and ROKU have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYFWF and ROKU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYFWF
1D Price
Change %
CYFWF100%
N/A
ROKU - CYFWF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
OAMCF - CYFWF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEVMY - CYFWF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPOP - CYFWF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
KUKE - CYFWF
1%
Poorly correlated
-10.26%
More

OAMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OAMCF and MCOIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OAMCF and MCOIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OAMCF
1D Price
Change %
OAMCF100%
N/A
MCOIF - OAMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYFWF - OAMCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KUKE - OAMCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-10.26%
RSVR - OAMCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.75%
ENTEF - OAMCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More