CYMBF
Price
$61.36
Change
+$4.21 (+7.37%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
FNNCF
Price
$7.68
Change
+$0.10 (+1.32%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
478.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYMBF vs FNNCF

Header iconCYMBF vs FNNCF Comparison
Open Charts CYMBF vs FNNCFBanner chart's image
Cymbria
Price$61.36
Change+$4.21 (+7.37%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.3B
Financial 15 Split
Price$7.68
Change+$0.10 (+1.32%)
Volume$900
Capitalization478.44M
CYMBF vs FNNCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYMBF vs. FNNCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYMBF is a Hold and FNNCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CYMBF: $61.36 vs. FNNCF: $7.68)
Brand notoriety: CYMBF and FNNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYMBF: 177% vs. FNNCF: 63%
Market capitalization -- CYMBF: $1.3B vs. FNNCF: $478.44M
CYMBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.3B. FNNCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $478.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYMBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNNCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CYMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNNCF is a better buy in the long-term than CYMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYMBF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNNCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYMBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • FNNCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CYMBF and FNNCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CYMBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FNNCF (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYMBF($1.3B) has a higher market cap than FNNCF($478M). CYMBF has higher P/E ratio than FNNCF: CYMBF (7.53) vs FNNCF (3.23). FNNCF YTD gains are higher at: 19.626 vs. CYMBF (17.728). CYMBF has higher revenues than FNNCF: CYMBF (280M) vs FNNCF (191M).
CYMBFFNNCFCYMBF / FNNCF
Capitalization1.3B478M272%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.72819.62690%
P/E Ratio7.533.23234%
Revenue280M191M147%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt50MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYMBF vs FNNCF: Fundamental Ratings
CYMBF
FNNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9995
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
277
SMR RATING
1..100
5323
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8034
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5045

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNNCF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYMBF (70). This means that FNNCF’s stock grew significantly faster than CYMBF’s over the last 12 months.

CYMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNCF (77). This means that CYMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as CYMBF (53). This means that FNNCF’s stock grew similarly to CYMBF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CYMBF (46). This means that FNNCF’s stock grew similarly to CYMBF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYMBF (80). This means that FNNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYMBFFNNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOLDX38.27N/A
N/A
Gabelli Gold AAA
FIDFX30.83N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Z
GAAEX6.00N/A
N/A
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy
TWEAX9.06N/A
N/A
American Century Equity Income A
SVXAX68.07N/A
N/A
Smead International Value A

CYMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYMBF and BTGGF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYMBF and BTGGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYMBF
1D Price
Change %
CYMBF100%
N/A
BTGGF - CYMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPZYF - CYMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNCF - CYMBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
CEVIY - CYMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXDF - CYMBF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
More

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and TPG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and TPG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
+1.32%
TPG - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
PAX - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CG - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARES - FNNCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
More