CYMBF
Price
$59.46
Change
+$0.74 (+1.26%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.05B
IPZYF
Price
$0.68
Change
+$0.07 (+11.48%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
796.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYMBF vs IPZYF

Header iconCYMBF vs IPZYF Comparison
Open Charts CYMBF vs IPZYFBanner chart's image
Cymbria
Price$59.46
Change+$0.74 (+1.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.05B
IP Group
Price$0.68
Change+$0.07 (+11.48%)
Volume$100
Capitalization796.97M
CYMBF vs IPZYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IPZYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYMBF vs. IPZYF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYMBF is a Hold and IPZYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CYMBF: $59.46 vs. IPZYF: $0.68)
Brand notoriety: CYMBF and IPZYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYMBF: 100% vs. IPZYF: 3%
Market capitalization -- CYMBF: $1.05B vs. IPZYF: $796.97M
CYMBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.05B. IPZYF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $796.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYMBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIPZYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CYMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IPZYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYMBF is a better buy in the long-term than IPZYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYMBF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPZYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYMBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • IPZYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CYMBF and IPZYF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CYMBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IPZYF (@Investment Managers) price change was +10.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYMBF($1.05B) has a higher market cap than IPZYF($797M). CYMBF has higher P/E ratio than IPZYF: CYMBF (44.44) vs IPZYF (41.84). IPZYF YTD gains are higher at: 15.323 vs. CYMBF (14.083). CYMBF has less debt than IPZYF: CYMBF (55M) vs IPZYF (63.2M). IPZYF has higher revenues than CYMBF: IPZYF (63.6M) vs CYMBF (40M).
CYMBFIPZYFCYMBF / IPZYF
Capitalization1.05B797M131%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.08315.32392%
P/E Ratio44.4441.84106%
Revenue40M63.6M63%
Total CashN/A60.5M-
Total Debt55M63.2M87%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYMBF vs IPZYF: Fundamental Ratings
CYMBF
IPZYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2100
SMR RATING
1..100
6590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
421
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPZYF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CYMBF (70). This means that IPZYF’s stock grew similarly to CYMBF’s over the last 12 months.

CYMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPZYF (100). This means that CYMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than IPZYF’s over the last 12 months.

CYMBF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as IPZYF (90). This means that CYMBF’s stock grew similarly to IPZYF’s over the last 12 months.

IPZYF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CYMBF (45). This means that IPZYF’s stock grew similarly to CYMBF’s over the last 12 months.

IPZYF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYMBF (42). This means that IPZYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYMBFIPZYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IPZYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESECX30.100.27
+0.91%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq C
GGESX24.900.18
+0.73%
Nationwide Global Sust Eq Instl Svc
LAVRX15.600.10
+0.65%
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
LIFEX16.670.10
+0.60%
Domini Sustainable Solutions Ins
HILTX22.730.04
+0.18%
Hartford International Value R5

CYMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYMBF and BTGGF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYMBF and BTGGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYMBF
1D Price
Change %
CYMBF100%
N/A
BTGGF - CYMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPZYF - CYMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNCF - CYMBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
CEVIY - CYMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXDF - CYMBF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
More

IPZYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IPZYF and CYMBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPZYF and CYMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPZYF
1D Price
Change %
IPZYF100%
N/A
CYMBF - IPZYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDKFF - IPZYF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
LGGNF - IPZYF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
IVSXF - IPZYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LBGUF - IPZYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More