Advertisement
CYMHF vs SGBX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYMHF is a Hold and SGBX is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYMHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGBX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CYMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SGBX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYMHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGBX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CYMHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SGBX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CYMHF (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -7.50% price change this week, while SGBX (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -21.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.78%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (+0.21% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| CYMHF | SGBX | CYMHF / SGBX | |
| Capitalization | 7.52M | 3.97M | 189% |
| EBITDA | -1.66M | -12.61M | 13% |
| Gain YTD | 19.706 | -73.258 | -27% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.71M | 4.09M | 91% |
| Total Cash | 55.5K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 4.79M | 12.5M | 38% |
CYMHF | SGBX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SGBX's Valuation (46) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYMHF (92) in the null industry. This means that SGBX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYMHF’s over the last 12 months.
SGBX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as CYMHF (100) in the null industry. This means that SGBX’s stock grew similarly to CYMHF’s over the last 12 months.
SGBX's SMR Rating (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as CYMHF (100) in the null industry. This means that SGBX’s stock grew similarly to CYMHF’s over the last 12 months.
CYMHF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGBX (98) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that CYMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGBX’s over the last 12 months.
CYMHF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SGBX (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that CYMHF’s stock grew similarly to SGBX’s over the last 12 months.
| CYMHF | SGBX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 41% | 9 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
CYMHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYMHF and ADFJF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYMHF and ADFJF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYMHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYMHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ADFJF - CYMHF | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.00% | ||
| PRLB - CYMHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| SGBX - CYMHF | -4% Poorly correlated | +2.69% | ||
| TG - CYMHF | -4% Poorly correlated | -1.13% | ||
| RYI - CYMHF | -5% Poorly correlated | -3.43% | ||
More | ||||
SGBX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGBX has been loosely correlated with GIFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGBX jumps, then GIFI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGBX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGBX | 100% | +2.69% | ||
| GIFI - SGBX | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| VMI - SGBX | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| TX - SGBX | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| SID - SGBX | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
| ACNT - SGBX | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||