Advertisement
CYRBY vs GFASY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYRBY is a Hold and GFASY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYRBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFASY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CYRBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GFASY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYRBY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFASY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CYRBY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GFASY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CYRBY (@Homebuilding) experienced а +6.03% price change this week, while GFASY (@Homebuilding) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.33%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Homebuilding (+0.86% weekly)Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| CYRBY | GFASY | CYRBY / GFASY | |
| Capitalization | 1.87B | 25.9M | 7,216% |
| EBITDA | 2.79B | 136M | 2,049% |
| Gain YTD | 88.481 | 10.000 | 885% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.98 | 3.84 | 156% |
| Revenue | 8.6B | 893M | 963% |
| Total Cash | 3.27B | 96.6M | 3,382% |
| Total Debt | 6.89B | 1.73B | 399% |
CYRBY | GFASY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 97 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 23 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GFASY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CYRBY (16). This means that GFASY’s stock grew similarly to CYRBY’s over the last 12 months.
CYRBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GFASY (100). This means that CYRBY’s stock grew similarly to GFASY’s over the last 12 months.
CYRBY's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFASY (91). This means that CYRBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFASY’s over the last 12 months.
CYRBY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFASY (97). This means that CYRBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFASY’s over the last 12 months.
GFASY's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as CYRBY (59). This means that GFASY’s stock grew similarly to CYRBY’s over the last 12 months.
| CYRBY | GFASY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
CYRBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYRBY and KBH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYRBY and KBH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYRBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYRBY | 100% | N/A | ||
| KBH - CYRBY | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
| NVR - CYRBY | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| LEN - CYRBY | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| TMHC - CYRBY | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| PHM - CYRBY | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
More | ||||
GFASY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GFASY and PSMMY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFASY and PSMMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFASY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFASY | 100% | N/A | ||
| PSMMY - GFASY | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
| BTDPY - GFASY | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.30% | ||
| NOBH - GFASY | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
| PSMMF - GFASY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CYRBY - GFASY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||