CYRBY
Price
$4.73
Change
-$0.02 (-0.42%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
GFASY
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.40 (-40.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
59.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYRBY vs GFASY

Header iconCYRBY vs GFASY Comparison
Open Charts CYRBY vs GFASYBanner chart's image
Cyrela Brazil Realty S.A
Price$4.73
Change-$0.02 (-0.42%)
Volume$14
Capitalization1.89B
Gafisa S.A
Price$0.60
Change-$0.40 (-40.00%)
Volume$40K
Capitalization59.06M
CYRBY vs GFASY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYRBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFASY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYRBY vs. GFASY commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYRBY is a Buy and GFASY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CYRBY: $4.73 vs. GFASY: $0.60)
Brand notoriety: CYRBY and GFASY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYRBY: 1% vs. GFASY: 570%
Market capitalization -- CYRBY: $1.89B vs. GFASY: $59.06M
CYRBY [@Homebuilding] is valued at $1.89B. GFASY’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $59.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYRBY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFASY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CYRBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFASY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYRBY is a better buy in the long-term than GFASY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYRBY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFASY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYRBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GFASY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CYRBY is a better buy in the short-term than GFASY.

Price Growth

CYRBY (@Homebuilding) experienced а +6.53% price change this week, while GFASY (@Homebuilding) price change was -39.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

CYRBY is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

GFASY is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+1.46% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYRBY($1.89B) has a higher market cap than GFASY($59.1M). CYRBY has higher P/E ratio than GFASY: CYRBY (10.29) vs GFASY (0.11). GFASY YTD gains are higher at: 200.000 vs. CYRBY (74.807). CYRBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.55B vs. GFASY (1.85M). CYRBY has more cash in the bank: 2.79B vs. GFASY (447M). GFASY has less debt than CYRBY: GFASY (943M) vs CYRBY (4.66B). CYRBY has higher revenues than GFASY: CYRBY (5.46B) vs GFASY (884M).
CYRBYGFASYCYRBY / GFASY
Capitalization1.89B59.1M3,198%
EBITDA1.55B1.85M84,037%
Gain YTD74.807200.00037%
P/E Ratio10.290.119,606%
Revenue5.46B884M618%
Total Cash2.79B447M625%
Total Debt4.66B943M494%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYRBY vs GFASY: Fundamental Ratings
CYRBY
GFASY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3384
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
4690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7532
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFASY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CYRBY (18). This means that GFASY’s stock grew similarly to CYRBY’s over the last 12 months.

CYRBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFASY (100). This means that CYRBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFASY’s over the last 12 months.

CYRBY's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFASY (90). This means that CYRBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFASY’s over the last 12 months.

CYRBY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GFASY (38). This means that CYRBY’s stock grew similarly to GFASY’s over the last 12 months.

GFASY's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYRBY (75). This means that GFASY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYRBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYRBYGFASY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYRBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFASY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLNDY2.15N/A
N/A
D&L Industries, Inc.
TPBTF0.08N/A
N/A
Betmakers Technology Group Ltd.
RNDXF0.04N/A
N/A
Randgold & Exploration Company Limited
SCRYY3.28-0.01
-0.15%
SCOR
MIELY42.62-0.75
-1.73%
Mitsubishi Electric Corp.

CYRBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYRBY and KBH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYRBY and KBH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYRBY
1D Price
Change %
CYRBY100%
-0.42%
KBH - CYRBY
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
NVR - CYRBY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
LEN - CYRBY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
TMHC - CYRBY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
PHM - CYRBY
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
More

GFASY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFASY and PSMMY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFASY and PSMMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFASY
1D Price
Change %
GFASY100%
N/A
PSMMY - GFASY
11%
Poorly correlated
-7.41%
BTDPY - GFASY
8%
Poorly correlated
-5.33%
NOBH - GFASY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSMMF - GFASY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYRBY - GFASY
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
More