CYSM
Price
$14.70
Change
-$0.30 (-2.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
32.26M
USB
Price
$48.88
Change
+$0.21 (+0.43%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.74B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYSM vs USB

Header iconCYSM vs USB Comparison
Open Charts CYSM vs USBBanner chart's image
Community Bancorp of Santa Maria
Price$14.70
Change-$0.30 (-2.00%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization32.26M
US Ban
Price$48.88
Change+$0.21 (+0.43%)
Volume$47.04K
Capitalization75.74B
CYSM vs USB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYSM vs. USB commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYSM is a Hold and USB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CYSM: $14.70 vs. USB: $48.67)
Brand notoriety: CYSM: Not notable vs. USB: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYSM: 16% vs. USB: 99%
Market capitalization -- CYSM: $32.26M vs. USB: $75.74B
CYSM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $32.26M. USB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $75.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYSM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CYSM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • USB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYSM is a better buy in the long-term than USB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYSM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CYSM and USB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CYSM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.17% price change this week, while USB (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

USB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USB($75.7B) has a higher market cap than CYSM($32.3M). USB has higher P/E ratio than CYSM: USB (11.64) vs CYSM (9.55). CYSM YTD gains are higher at: 40.130 vs. USB (4.112). CYSM has less debt than USB: CYSM (14.4M) vs USB (79.1B). USB has higher revenues than CYSM: USB (27.7B) vs CYSM (15.5M).
CYSMUSBCYSM / USB
Capitalization32.3M75.7B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.1304.112976%
P/E Ratio9.5511.6482%
Revenue15.5M27.7B0%
Total Cash5.62MN/A-
Total Debt14.4M79.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYSM vs USB: Fundamental Ratings
CYSM
USB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9013
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3057
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4527
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYSM's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USB (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CYSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than USB’s over the last 12 months.

CYSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as USB (57) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CYSM’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

CYSM's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as USB (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CYSM’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's Price Growth Rating (27) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CYSM (45) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to CYSM’s over the last 12 months.

USB's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CYSM (100) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to CYSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYSMUSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NAUH0.050.01
+12.50%
National American University Holdings, Inc.
THKLY13.740.21
+1.55%
THK Co., Ltd.
ARTNB33.20N/A
N/A
Artesian Resources Corp.
IDIG0.05N/A
N/A
International Digital Holding, Inc.
UNIRF4.87N/A
N/A
Unibail Rodamco

CYSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYSM and BSSC have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYSM and BSSC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYSM
1D Price
Change %
CYSM100%
N/A
BSSC - CYSM
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USB - CYSM
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
CBSH - CYSM
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
TFC - CYSM
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
ZION - CYSM
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More