CYSNF
Price
$0.66
Change
+$0.05 (+8.20%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
27.48M
ERIC
Price
$8.07
Change
+$0.07 (+0.88%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.48B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYSNF vs ERIC

Header iconCYSNF vs ERIC Comparison
Open Charts CYSNF vs ERICBanner chart's image
C-COM Satellite Systems
Price$0.66
Change+$0.05 (+8.20%)
Volume$400
Capitalization27.48M
Ericsson
Price$8.07
Change+$0.07 (+0.88%)
Volume$143.53K
Capitalization26.48B
CYSNF vs ERIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ERIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYSNF vs. ERIC commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYSNF is a StrongBuy and ERIC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CYSNF: $0.66 vs. ERIC: $8.00)
Brand notoriety: CYSNF: Not notable vs. ERIC: Notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYSNF: 12% vs. ERIC: 104%
Market capitalization -- CYSNF: $27.48M vs. ERIC: $26.48B
CYSNF [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $27.48M. ERIC’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $26.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $264.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $7.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYSNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileERIC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CYSNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ERIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ERIC is a better buy in the long-term than CYSNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYSNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ERIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYSNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ERIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ERIC is a better buy in the short-term than CYSNF.

Price Growth

CYSNF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +2.22% price change this week, while ERIC (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

ERIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+2.92% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERIC($26.5B) has a higher market cap than CYSNF($27.5M). CYSNF has higher P/E ratio than ERIC: CYSNF (21.91) vs ERIC (14.31). ERIC YTD gains are higher at: 0.877 vs. CYSNF (-18.366). ERIC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 28.3B vs. CYSNF (-1.63M). ERIC has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. CYSNF (15.7M). CYSNF has less debt than ERIC: CYSNF (1.36M) vs ERIC (43.8B). ERIC has higher revenues than CYSNF: ERIC (246B) vs CYSNF (4.96M).
CYSNFERICCYSNF / ERIC
Capitalization27.5M26.5B0%
EBITDA-1.63M28.3B-0%
Gain YTD-18.3660.877-2,094%
P/E Ratio21.9114.31153%
Revenue4.96M246B0%
Total Cash15.7M42.3B0%
Total Debt1.36M43.8B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYSNF vs ERIC: Fundamental Ratings
CYSNF
ERIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1021
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9445
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ERIC's Valuation (7) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CYSNF (21) in the null industry. This means that ERIC’s stock grew similarly to CYSNF’s over the last 12 months.

ERIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CYSNF (100) in the null industry. This means that ERIC’s stock grew similarly to CYSNF’s over the last 12 months.

ERIC's SMR Rating (45) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYSNF (94) in the null industry. This means that ERIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYSNF’s over the last 12 months.

ERIC's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CYSNF (88) in the null industry. This means that ERIC’s stock grew similarly to CYSNF’s over the last 12 months.

CYSNF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as ERIC (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CYSNF’s stock grew similarly to ERIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYSNFERIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ERIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNRS38.170.81
+2.18%
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF
SPRX38.140.27
+0.71%
Spear Alpha ETF
RULE22.76N/A
N/A
Adaptive Core ETF
ZTR6.24-0.01
-0.16%
Virtus Total Return Fund
SPYX54.23-0.09
-0.17%
SPDR® S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Rsrv Free ETF

CYSNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYSNF and BEWFF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYSNF and BEWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYSNF
1D Price
Change %
CYSNF100%
+8.12%
BEWFF - CYSNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERIC - CYSNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
ETCIA - CYSNF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKWL - CYSNF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
EUTLF - CYSNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
More

ERIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERIC has been loosely correlated with NOK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERIC jumps, then NOK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERIC
1D Price
Change %
ERIC100%
+0.50%
NOK - ERIC
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
ERIXF - ERIC
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KN - ERIC
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NOKBF - ERIC
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.70%
ZBRA - ERIC
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
More