CYSNF vs ERIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYSNF is a Hold and ERIC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYSNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileERIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CYSNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ERIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYSNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ERIC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CYSNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ERIC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CYSNF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -3.98% price change this week, while ERIC (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -1.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
ERIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (-3.49% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
| CYSNF | ERIC | CYSNF / ERIC | |
| Capitalization | 43.7M | 18B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -583.93K | -8.9B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -22.271 | 35.838 | -62% |
| P/E Ratio | 3160.90 | 13.57 | 23,296% |
| Revenue | 7.37M | 263B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 16M | 50.3B | 0% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 54.3B | - |
CYSNF | ERIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CYSNF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as ERIC (10) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CYSNF’s stock grew similarly to ERIC’s over the last 12 months.
ERIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CYSNF (100) in the null industry. This means that ERIC’s stock grew similarly to CYSNF’s over the last 12 months.
CYSNF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as ERIC (89) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CYSNF’s stock grew similarly to ERIC’s over the last 12 months.
ERIC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CYSNF (73) in the null industry. This means that ERIC’s stock grew similarly to CYSNF’s over the last 12 months.
ERIC's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYSNF (100) in the null industry. This means that ERIC’s stock grew significantly faster than CYSNF’s over the last 12 months.
| CYSNF | ERIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 66% | 14 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 46% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LIT | 43.45 | -0.08 | -0.18% |
| Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | |||
| DOCT | 39.81 | -0.12 | -0.30% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Oct | |||
| IWR | 91.34 | -0.80 | -0.87% |
| iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| BDCZ | 19.01 | -0.23 | -1.20% |
| UBS ETRACS Wells Fargo® Busn Dev Co ETN | |||
| INDL | 64.59 | -1.48 | -2.24% |
| Direxion Daily MSCI India Bull 2x ETF | |||
CYSNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYSNF and BEWFF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYSNF and BEWFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYSNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYSNF | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| BEWFF - CYSNF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
| ERIC - CYSNF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| ETCIA - CYSNF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FKWL - CYSNF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| EUTLF - CYSNF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ERIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERIC has been loosely correlated with NOK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERIC jumps, then NOK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ERIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERIC | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| NOK - ERIC | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| ADTN - ERIC | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
| ERIXF - ERIC | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| KN - ERIC | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| NOKBF - ERIC | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.59% | ||
More | ||||