CYTK vs TRAW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYTK is a Hold and TRAW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYTK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRAW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CYTK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TRAW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYTK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRAW’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CYTK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- TRAW’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CYTK (@Biotechnology) experienced а +0.45% price change this week, while TRAW (@Biotechnology) price change was +7.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
CYTK is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
TRAW is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (-2.20% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| CYTK | TRAW | CYTK / TRAW | |
| Capitalization | 5.78B | 15.2M | 38,013% |
| EBITDA | -481.94M | -24.08M | 2,001% |
| Gain YTD | -41.466 | -73.069 | 57% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.22M | 226K | 1,424% |
| Total Cash | 1.01B | 5.41M | 18,706% |
| Total Debt | 790M | N/A | - |
CYTK | TRAW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TRAW's Valuation (32) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYTK (100). This means that TRAW’s stock grew significantly faster than CYTK’s over the last 12 months.
CYTK's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRAW (100). This means that CYTK’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRAW’s over the last 12 months.
CYTK's SMR Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as TRAW (100). This means that CYTK’s stock grew similarly to TRAW’s over the last 12 months.
CYTK's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as TRAW (65). This means that CYTK’s stock grew similarly to TRAW’s over the last 12 months.
CYTK's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRAW (100). This means that CYTK’s stock grew significantly faster than TRAW’s over the last 12 months.
| CYTK | TRAW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 86% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CNRG | 60.97 | 1.71 | +2.88% |
| SPDR® Kensho Clean Power ETF | |||
| PMAY | 35.85 | 0.17 | +0.48% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-May | |||
| SHM | 47.35 | 0.09 | +0.19% |
| SPDR® Nuveen Blmbg ST MunBd ETF | |||
| TCHI | 18.11 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF | |||
| FEDM | 47.88 | -0.08 | -0.17% |
| FlexShares ESG&Clmt Dev Mkts ex-US Cr | |||
CYTK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYTK has been loosely correlated with KRON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYTK jumps, then KRON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYTK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYTK | 100% | +4.56% | ||
| KRON - CYTK | 43% Loosely correlated | +3.21% | ||
| IOVA - CYTK | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| DARE - CYTK | 42% Loosely correlated | -9.06% | ||
| CKPT - CYTK | 41% Loosely correlated | +11.28% | ||
| DSGN - CYTK | 40% Loosely correlated | +4.34% | ||
More | ||||
TRAW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRAW has been loosely correlated with MDGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRAW jumps, then MDGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRAW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRAW | 100% | -5.90% | ||
| MDGL - TRAW | 39% Loosely correlated | +5.12% | ||
| CYTK - TRAW | 36% Loosely correlated | +4.56% | ||
| ORMP - TRAW | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.82% | ||
| SNPX - TRAW | 32% Poorly correlated | +19.69% | ||
| AXON - TRAW | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.60% | ||
More | ||||