CYTOF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.11 (-26.83%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
SPHDF
Price
$9.42
Change
-$2.28 (-19.49%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

CYTOF vs SPHDF

Header iconCYTOF vs SPHDF Comparison
Open Charts CYTOF vs SPHDFBanner chart's image
Altamira Therapeutics
Price$0.30
Change-$0.11 (-26.83%)
Volume$830.27K
CapitalizationN/A
Santhera Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Price$9.42
Change-$2.28 (-19.49%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
CYTOF vs SPHDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CYTOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYTOF vs. SPHDF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYTOF is a Hold and SPHDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CYTOF: $0.12 vs. SPHDF: $9.42)
Brand notoriety: CYTOF and SPHDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYTOF: 455% vs. SPHDF: 197%
Market capitalization -- CYTOF: $452.67K vs. SPHDF: $141.87M
CYTOF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $452.67K. SPHDF’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $141.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $464.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYTOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPHDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CYTOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SPHDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPHDF is a better buy in the long-term than CYTOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYTOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPHDF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYTOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SPHDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CYTOF is a better buy in the short-term than SPHDF.

Price Growth

CYTOF (@Biotechnology) experienced а -72.40% price change this week, while SPHDF (@Biotechnology) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-2.20% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPHDF($142M) has a higher market cap than CYTOF($453K). SPHDF has higher P/E ratio than CYTOF: SPHDF (1.46) vs CYTOF (0.07). SPHDF YTD gains are higher at: -19.487 vs. CYTOF (-96.557).
CYTOFSPHDFCYTOF / SPHDF
Capitalization453K142M0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-96.557-19.487495%
P/E Ratio0.071.465%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYTOF vs SPHDF: Fundamental Ratings
CYTOF
SPHDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9784
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10054
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
23n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYTOF's Valuation (7) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPHDF (50) in the null industry. This means that CYTOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPHDF’s over the last 12 months.

CYTOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as SPHDF (100) in the null industry. This means that CYTOF’s stock grew similarly to SPHDF’s over the last 12 months.

CYTOF's SMR Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as SPHDF (100) in the null industry. This means that CYTOF’s stock grew similarly to SPHDF’s over the last 12 months.

SPHDF's Price Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as CYTOF (97) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SPHDF’s stock grew similarly to CYTOF’s over the last 12 months.

SPHDF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYTOF (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SPHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYTOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYTOFSPHDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CYTOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VERI2.300.12
+5.50%
Veritone
TME11.950.16
+1.36%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
COGT7.840.04
+0.51%
Cogent Biosciences
KFY66.560.33
+0.50%
Korn Ferry
XIN2.27-0.23
-9.20%
Xinyuan Real Estate Co Ltd

CYTOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYTOF has been loosely correlated with CMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYTOF jumps, then CMND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYTOF
1D Price
Change %
CYTOF100%
-60.07%
CMND - CYTOF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
COGT - CYTOF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
SPHDF - CYTOF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LOGC - CYTOF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.51%
UBX - CYTOF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
More

SPHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPHDF has been closely correlated with TRML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPHDF jumps, then TRML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPHDF
1D Price
Change %
SPHDF100%
N/A
TRML - SPHDF
78%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
COGT - SPHDF
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
MEOBF - SPHDF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KROS - SPHDF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
CYTOF - SPHDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-60.07%
More