CYVF
Price
$65.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
85.94M
ILPMY
Price
$2.03
Change
+$0.01 (+0.50%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYVF vs ILPMY

Header iconCYVF vs ILPMY Comparison
Open Charts CYVF vs ILPMYBanner chart's image
Crystal Valley Financial
Price$65.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization85.94M
Permanent TSB Group Holdings
Price$2.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.50%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.37B
CYVF vs ILPMY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYVF vs. ILPMY commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYVF is a Hold and ILPMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CYVF: $65.00 vs. ILPMY: $2.03)
Brand notoriety: CYVF and ILPMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYVF: 182% vs. ILPMY: 3%
Market capitalization -- CYVF: $85.94M vs. ILPMY: $1.37B
CYVF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $85.94M. ILPMY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileILPMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CYVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ILPMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYVF is a better buy in the long-term than ILPMY.

Price Growth

CYVF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ILPMY (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CYVF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

ILPMY is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILPMY($1.37B) has a higher market cap than CYVF($85.9M). ILPMY YTD gains are higher at: 17.681 vs. CYVF (3.073).
CYVFILPMYCYVF / ILPMY
Capitalization85.9M1.37B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.07317.68117%
P/E RatioN/A4.52-
RevenueN/A413M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A948M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYVF vs ILPMY: Fundamental Ratings
CYVF
ILPMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3398
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1046
SMR RATING
1..100
239
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5698
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ILPMY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYVF (48). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ILPMY (46). This means that CYVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ILPMY’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMY's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CYVF (23). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

ILPMY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CYVF (50). This means that ILPMY’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ILPMY (98). This means that CYVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ILPMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBLSX10.56N/A
N/A
Allspring Large Cap Value Inst
GABOX13.58N/A
N/A
Gabelli International Small Cap AAA
ANDVX10.10N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Dividend Value R6
JDICX15.66N/A
N/A
JHancock Disciplined Value Intl C
CCWIX21.15N/A
N/A
Baird Chautauqua International Gr Instl

CYVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYVF and CFBK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYVF and CFBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYVF
1D Price
Change %
CYVF100%
N/A
CFBK - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
FSUN - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
SSBI - CYVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
ALRS - CYVF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
ILPMY - CYVF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
More

ILPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILPMY and PBLOF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILPMY and PBLOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILPMY
1D Price
Change %
ILPMY100%
+0.74%
PBLOF - ILPMY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNRV - ILPMY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - ILPMY
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
CYVF - ILPMY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGBI - ILPMY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More