CYVF
Price
$65.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
85.94M
SSBI
Price
$9.94
Change
+$0.13 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jun 5, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
73.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYVF vs SSBI

Header iconCYVF vs SSBI Comparison
Open Charts CYVF vs SSBIBanner chart's image
Crystal Valley Financial
Price$65.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization85.94M
Summit State Bank
Price$9.94
Change+$0.13 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization73.61M
CYVF vs SSBI Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYVF vs. SSBI commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYVF is a Hold and SSBI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CYVF: $65.00 vs. SSBI: $9.81)
Brand notoriety: CYVF and SSBI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYVF: 182% vs. SSBI: 193%
Market capitalization -- CYVF: $85.94M vs. SSBI: $73.61M
CYVF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $85.94M. SSBI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $73.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSSBI’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CYVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SSBI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYVF is a better buy in the long-term than SSBI.

Price Growth

CYVF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SSBI (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CYVF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

SSBI is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYVF($85.9M) has a higher market cap than SSBI($73.6M). SSBI YTD gains are higher at: 28.235 vs. CYVF (3.073).
CYVFSSBICYVF / SSBI
Capitalization85.9M73.6M117%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.07328.23511%
P/E RatioN/A6.56-
RevenueN/A45.6M-
Total CashN/A86.6M-
Total DebtN/A5.92M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYVF vs SSBI: Fundamental Ratings
CYVF
SSBI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3322
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1080
SMR RATING
1..100
2329
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
567
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSBI's Valuation (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CYVF (48) in the null industry. This means that SSBI’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSBI (80) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew significantly faster than SSBI’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as SSBI (29) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to SSBI’s over the last 12 months.

SSBI's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CYVF (50) in the null industry. This means that SSBI’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

SSBI's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYVF (56) in the null industry. This means that SSBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPCB11.461.65
+16.88%
SuperCom Ltd
NOTE0.670.02
+3.43%
FiscalNote Holdings
BXP71.230.85
+1.21%
BXP Inc.
RAMP32.700.01
+0.03%
LiveRamp Holdings
BFST23.25-0.35
-1.48%
Business First Bancshares

CYVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYVF and CFBK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYVF and CFBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYVF
1D Price
Change %
CYVF100%
N/A
CFBK - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
FSUN - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
SSBI - CYVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
ALRS - CYVF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
ILPMY - CYVF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
More

SSBI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSBI and LARK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSBI and LARK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSBI
1D Price
Change %
SSBI100%
+1.03%
LARK - SSBI
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
AUBN - SSBI
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
ALRS - SSBI
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
OZK - SSBI
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
FGBIP - SSBI
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
More