CYVF
Price
$68.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
86.85M
SSBI
Price
$11.52
Change
-$0.33 (-2.78%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
78.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CYVF vs SSBI

Header iconCYVF vs SSBI Comparison
Open Charts CYVF vs SSBIBanner chart's image
Crystal Valley Financial
Price$68.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$888
Capitalization86.85M
Summit State Bank
Price$11.52
Change-$0.33 (-2.78%)
Volume$5.9K
Capitalization78.01M
CYVF vs SSBI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CYVF vs. SSBI commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYVF is a StrongBuy and SSBI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CYVF: $68.00 vs. SSBI: $11.52)
Brand notoriety: CYVF and SSBI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYVF: 39% vs. SSBI: 41%
Market capitalization -- CYVF: $86.85M vs. SSBI: $78.01M
CYVF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $86.85M. SSBI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $78.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSSBI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CYVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SSBI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYVF is a better buy in the long-term than SSBI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CYVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSBI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CYVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SSBI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CYVF is a better buy in the short-term than SSBI.

Price Growth

CYVF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while SSBI (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYVF($86.9M) has a higher market cap than SSBI($78M). SSBI has higher P/E ratio than CYVF: SSBI (12.48) vs CYVF (7.68). SSBI YTD gains are higher at: 50.588 vs. CYVF (8.592). SSBI has more cash in the bank: 40.1M vs. CYVF (12.1M). SSBI has less debt than CYVF: SSBI (5.94M) vs CYVF (39.5M). SSBI (34.7M) and CYVF (34.3M) have equivalent revenues.
CYVFSSBICYVF / SSBI
Capitalization86.9M78M111%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.59250.58817%
P/E Ratio7.6812.4862%
Revenue34.3M34.7M99%
Total Cash12.1M40.1M30%
Total Debt39.5M5.94M665%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CYVF vs SSBI: Fundamental Ratings
CYVF
SSBI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8252
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1274
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYVF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as SSBI (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to SSBI’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSBI (74) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSBI’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SSBI (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to SSBI’s over the last 12 months.

SSBI's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CYVF (51) in the null industry. This means that SSBI’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

SSBI's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CYVF (100) in the null industry. This means that SSBI’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CYVFSSBI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRYBF0.04N/A
+9.20%
Dynamite Blockchain Corp.
CBGZF0.310.01
+1.74%
Cabral Gold Inc.
ANYYY14.550.10
+0.69%
Aena SME S.A.
IESFY133.21N/A
N/A
Interconexion Electrica S.A. E.S.P. - ISA
KIERF2.50N/A
N/A
Kier Group Plc

CYVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYVF and CFBK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYVF and CFBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYVF
1D Price
Change %
CYVF100%
N/A
CFBK - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
FSUN - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
SSBI - CYVF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
ALRS - CYVF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
ILPMY - CYVF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SSBI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSBI and LARK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSBI and LARK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSBI
1D Price
Change %
SSBI100%
-2.78%
LARK - SSBI
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
AUBN - SSBI
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALRS - SSBI
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
OZK - SSBI
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
FGBIP - SSBI
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
More