Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CZA vs IJH
CZA vs IJH Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs IJH
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$108.42
Change+$0.96 (+0.89%)
Volume$150
Net Assets177.2M
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Price$62.30
Change-$1.00 (-1.58%)
Volume$97.29K
Net Assets96.8B
CZA vs IJH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. IJH commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a Hold and IJH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IJH has more net assets: 96.8B vs. CZA (177M). CZA has a higher annual dividend yield than IJH: CZA (2.868) vs IJH (0.836). CZA was incepted earlier than IJH: CZA (19 years) vs IJH (26 years). IJH (0.05) has a lower expense ratio than CZA (0.69). CZA has a higher turnover IJH (18.00) vs IJH (18.00).
| CZA | IJH | CZA / IJH | |
| Gain YTD | 2.868 | 0.836 | 343% |
| Net Assets | 177M | 96.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.05 | 1,380% |
| Turnover | 112.00 | 18.00 | 622% |
| Yield | 1.21 | 1.28 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | IJH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CZA and FMC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CZA and FMC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
IJH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJH has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJH jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y