Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CZA vs IJH
CZA vs IJH Comparison
Open Charts CZA vs IJH
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Price$109.48
Change-$0.46 (-0.42%)
Volume$6.06K
CapitalizationN/A
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Price$64.17
Change-$0.69 (-1.06%)
Volume$10.03M
CapitalizationN/A
CZA vs IJH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CZA vs. IJH commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZA is a StrongSell and IJH is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IJH has more net assets: 95.6B vs. CZA (206M). IJH (16.847) and CZA (16.702) have matching annual dividend yield . CZA was incepted earlier than IJH: CZA (18 years) vs IJH (25 years). CZA has a higher turnover IJH (18.00) vs IJH (18.00).
| CZA | IJH | CZA / IJH | |
| Gain YTD | 16.702 | 16.847 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 206M | 95.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 122.00 | 18.00 | 678% |
| Yield | 1.26 | 1.28 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CZA | IJH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZA has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZA jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CZA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZA | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| JHG - CZA | 74% Closely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| ESNT - CZA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| RHP - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| ACT - CZA | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| ESAB - CZA | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
More | ||||
IJH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IJH has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IJH jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IJH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJH | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| UFPI - IJH | 81% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| AVNT - IJH | 80% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| KMT - IJH | 79% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| KBH - IJH | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| FBIN - IJH | 79% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
More | ||||